A Study On The Study Of The Book Of Songs In The Sui And Tang Dynasties

The Shangshu studying of Sui and Tang Dynasties is a transitional period in the history of Shangshu studying.Experiencing the Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties with many controversial issues of Shangshu studying the Shangshu studying of Sui and Tang Dynasties gradually moves towards the unification.lt is this unity causes loss of many versions of Shangshu. It is this unity leads to the loss of many kinds of explanation about Shangshu. Wei Bao is the only one collation over version also handed down.On the meaning of Shangshu,only Kong Yingda’s interpretation of handed down.The Shangshu studying of Sui and Tang Dynasties after learning unification became depression.The Sui Dynasty is very short,so few monographs on Shangshu.The Explanation of the Terms and phrases of the Shangshu by Lu Deming is the only preserved works.But because be censored in the Song Dynasty,it not what it used to be.This paper mainly compares the text of the transcript of Tang Dynasty and the one of nowadays of the Explanation of the Terms and phrases of the YAO DIAN.Summary the deletion, intrinsic motivation and probe into the rule of censored. On this basis,the deletion of the Explanation of the Terms and phrases of the YAO DIAN is presumed.The conclusion is that this book has experienced two deletion, respectively in the Northern Song Dynasty and the Southern Song Dynasty.In addition, by comparing the text of the transcript of Tang Dynasty and the one of nowadays of the Explanation of the Terms and phrases of the YAO DIAN,and with Lu Deming’s Preface,this paper explores this work style. The conclusion of this paper is the deletion of completely destroying its original style.In addition to the Lu Deming books, Liu Zhuo, Liu Xuan, and Gu Biao left incomplete books about Shangshu. Through the study of these incomplete data, we can draw the outline of the Shangshu studying of Sui Dynasty. Gu Biao focus on Shangshu than to the attention of KONG ZHUAN.Gu Biao directly explains Shangshu meaning or references to others explanation,these places KONG ZHUAN didn’t explain.Gu Biao explained to Shangshu bas a lot of place don’t agree with KONG ZHUAN.SHANG SHU ZHENG YI cites Gu Biao’s explanation,the purpose is to explain KONG ZHUAN.however there are still many different points of view to retain,visible Gu Biao has many don’t agree with KONG ZHUAN. Especially about astronomy, geography, naming, the content of the system, Gu Biao adopted Zheng Xuan’s theory is more. The above evidences can prove Ma Guohan’s point of view, that is, Gu Biao’s theory on KONG ZHUAN, but also absorbs a lot of the views of others.The academic circles has been thought that SHANG SHU ZHENG YI is a book by former materials compiled works. There are three specific claims. First, SHANG SHU ZHENG YI inherits Liu Xuan. In second, SHANG SHU ZHENG YI inherits Liu Zhuo and Liu Xuan. In third, SHANG SHU ZHENG YI inherits a lot of research. In this paper, through the analysis and study of Liu Zhuo and Liu Xuan, we can draw a conclusion, is that SHANG SHU ZHENG YI mainly absorbs their works. Ji Yun’s point of view can not be easily changed.The uniform interpretation of collation and meaning of the text is the main contents of the Shangshu studying of Tang Dynasty.There are many versions of Shangshu. The difference not only exists in the Jinwen and ancient, and Jinwen and Jinwen different, classical Chinese and classical Chinese different. The text of the collation, always is the emphases of the research work. In the Tang Dynasty, people do most of the emendation work. The work mainly includes the following contents. First, Yan Shigu collated books in the government’s orders. Second, Wei Bao changes the ancient words become modern words, this is also the order of the government. In third, Li Longji changed the text of Hong Fan. Fourth, Zhang Can collated classic text. In fifth, Tang Xuandu wrote a book about the classic texts. Finally, Li Ang summaries the former generation of scholars of the results, and carves out of a book, this book written in stone. Through these measures, the Tang government completed the unification of Shangshu text.Standard Version of Confucian classics was collated is Shangshu version of the unified began in the Tang dynasty. The academic circles dispute is the largest of a Standard Version of Confucian classics mentioned in the WU JING ZHENG YI is written by Yan Shigu. In this paper, through the analysis of the previous view, draw a conclusion, this conclusion is WU JING ZHENG YI may not be in the standard version of Yan Shigu. In this paper, through the research of previous theory, the conclusion is that WU JING ZHENG YI may not according to the Standard Version of Yan Shigu, but WU JING ZHENG YI with the standard version of Yan Shigu as an important reference. The Standard Version mentioned in WU JING ZHENG YI both a standard version before the Tang Dynasty, and the standard version of Yan Shigu.Wei Bao changing the Shangshu font is one of the most important events in the history of academic. It is described by Duan Yucai as Shangshu’s disaster. In this paper, through the concrete analysis, the conclusion is that before Wei Bao, Minister of the text has been changed a lot. The old version of Wei Bao on the basis of the version is not in Wei Jin Dynasty. Wei Bao is to replace the old font with the Tang Dynasty popular font, its essence is the font changes, rather than word changes. These changes have occurred long before Wei Bao. Wei Bao to change the font, is conducive to the book of history heritage, on the other hand, caused a lot of mistakes.The Tang Dynasty government selection of personnel through the examination. This test is based on the Confucian classics. Unity is the objective need of Confucian classics. Therefore, the Tang government organization personnel compiling the WU JING ZHENG YI.WU JING ZHENG YI is mainly based on KONG ZHUAN.Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan’s academic to be discarded. Future generations of scholars are not satisfied. Duan Yucai thought this is a disaster. This paper examines the spread of Confucian classics and the characteristics of KONG ZHUAN at the time, and then draw a conclusion, that is SHANG SHU ZHENG YI to KONG ZHUAN as the basis is the objective requirement. About SHANG SHU ZHENG YI against KONG ZHUAN’s problem, there are a lot of academic controversy. SHANG SHU ZHENG YI was raised to maintain KONG ZHUAN, at the same time, some other people think SHANG SHU ZHENG YI is sometimes presented the arguments against KONG ZHUAN. This paper’s argument is that SHANG SHU ZHENG YI is really KONG ZHUAN maintenance, but occasionally against KONG ZHUAN, the reason for this phenomenon lies in the fact that SHANG SHU ZHENG YI sometimes inadequate, is not the subjective desire of SHANG SHU ZHENG YI.Often criticized by later scholars, especially the scholars of Qing Dynasty, SHANG SHU ZHENG YI’s academic value is still worthy of recognition and excavation. From the collation of this aspect, SHANG SHU ZHENG YI involved in every chapter, verses, shape and other aspects, comprehensive use of a variety of modes of collation, Shangshu carried out in-depth research. These achievements have important academic value. At the same time,there are many advanced concepts in this book, so the book reflects the definite article concept. This book is not devoted to the study of words, but the words one of the very important research content. In this paper, through the analysis of this works, discovers that it not only direct interpretation of words, but also explains the theory of KONG ZHUAN. In addition, this book also summed up some about KONG ZHUAN law. The theory about words, mainly by the Qing Dynasty scholars use, in this book have begun to appear. They interpret the meaning of a word is mainly based on the sound, shape, content, and grammar.Research on KONG ZHUAN of the hand written text is an important part of the Shangshu studying of the Sui and Tang Dynasties.The writings of KONG ZHUAN basically with old letters.These fonts used mainly in Wei Bao rewrites before. Although the use of a lot of handwritten Chinese character, and there are a lot of incomplete and wrong, but it is not the person later defaced, so basically the original appearance, reflects the changes before the text font face. Handwritten book and now version comparison, can be found in Shangshu text evolution law. In a word,KONG ZHUAN of the hand written text has great academic value.Comparing KONG ZHUAN of the hand written text and the current version, This paper draws the following conclusions:first, the end of the sentence with the handwritten superfluous words, writing purpose is neatly written. Second, in the handwriting of volume, Shang Shu’s words and KONG ZHUAN’s is not consistent, the current version is not so, the current version might get changed.Third.in the handwriting of volume,Shang shu’s words often different,this shows that when the Confucian classic word very confused. Therefore, the Tang government unified the Confucian classics of the text is necessary. Handwritten volume and the current version in the content are different. the situation may be there are different versions of KONG ZHUAN.Handwritten volumes and the writings of Lu Deming correspondence exists in the words. In this paper, by comparison, found that this part of the word used in the works of Lu Deming with the same version now.KONG ZHUAN of Handwritten volumes and the current version are very different,so this paper on the Six Dynasties written volume with the current version of the detailed comparison, the purpose is to provide the basic data for the study of Shangshu different text.