The Comparative Study About Kant, Marx, Heidegger's Practice And Cognition Relation Thoughts

As the topic about the cognition grasping the practice, the article compares the relation thoughts about the cognition and the practice of Kant, Marx and Heidegger. It inspires people better understanding of Marx's philosophy.What Marx philosophy has left us is the text, ideas, but it is pointing to the Revolutionary practice activities about transforming the world. How does Marx's philosophy drill the Interiority of consciousness, surpasses theory of knowledge and Becomes the philosophy of practice? I think that it is inseparable with Marx critically inheriting Germany's classical philosophy, especially Kant's philosophy.Kant points out that"thing-in-itself"existence but we can't know it. Kant's philosophy"realizes it that not to been met"and"see the thing which not to been watched". Kant points out the different between the material force and the concept. Marx has jettisoned the former understanding thoughts including Kant. In the different and objectivity relationship with the understanding and the practice, Marx sure the ontology function of sensation and the cognitive function and realizes the practice surpassing the cognition. Marx's epistemology not only provides spiritual weapon with human liberation d and points out the real material strength to human liberation. Reading Marx's philosophy from the Heidegger's subsistence helps better us to avoid to understand mechanically and dogmatically Marx's philosophy thoughts. The important achievement which the Modern philosophical epistemology get along with the ideas of the objectivity and heterogeneity relationship of the knowledge grasping the practice reflect the important influence of the understanding and the practice of Kant, Marx, Heidegger's to the study on the modern philosophy.Around the theme, this paper will be divided into five parts of interrelated.Introduction: Analyzing mostly what the relationship between the practice and the cognition is In the philosophical In the present, what the relationship ideas between the practice and the cognition is In marxist philosophy and the special significance of the comparison about the transcendence of the practice to the understanding of Kant, Marx and Heidegger, introduce simply the basic ideas and the arrangement of chapters of the article.The first chapter: introducing simply to the scholars'the research results of the relationship ideas between the practice and the cognition of Kant, Marx and Heidegge. Some literature separately study on the three epistemological thoughts, some comprehensively compare a research them. The most important literature are " the practice", "the priori object" and"the Dasin"in this research. Here we can find the highly consistency and comparability of the three ideas.Chapter 2: Kant's "thing-in-itself" heterogeneity thoughts. This chapter detailed analyzed Kant's Heterogeneity thoughts of"thing-in-itself". The phenomena are different with the"thing-in-itself"in principle. I think that Kant's"thing-in-itself"puts forward"realizes it that not to been met"and"see the thing which not to been watched". These ideas obligate the space for us knowing"the unknown"in understanding, and prepare the content condition for the philosophy epistemology surpassing the epistemology.Chapter 3: Marx's objective relationship thoughts between the practice and the understanding. This chapter mainly analysis Marx's being the source of the congition, we being able to know the practice through the purely experienc method, the practice is different with the understanding in nature, the practice surpassing the understanding, the relation of ideology of the practice and the understanding, and analyze by the way to know which Marx is sure of; we know that the understanding and the practice is heterogeneous unity relations.Chapter 4: studying comparatively on the ideas of the understanding grasping the practice of Kant, Marx and Heidegger. The first part mainly expounds the content on Marx Aufhebungging Kant's epistemology through comparing the understanding and the object relational thoughts between Marx and Kant. This paper firstly analyzes the Marx sublating of Hegelian dialectics. In the end of the logic of Hegel, the absolute idea produced bored emotion. The boredom for their own empty and the intense desire for the content show the absolute idea releases out of itself as the nature from itself. Secondly analyses Marx criticize and inherit of Kant's Epistemological thoughts. Kant's philosophical epistemology"see the thing which not to been watched","thing-in-itself", it make the congition being produced as the subject to excite the object, so it amount s to the practice. For"it is not the consciousness but life which determines the consciousness", therefore we conclude that Kant's philosophy"The thing itself"equivalent to the practice in Marx's philosophy. In this sense, we decide that Marx's epistemology includes the practice activity which is different with the concept. But the congitiong only approximately is able to show the practice as they are different with each other in nature. So it is not the real "practice". In the objectivity relationgship, the show of the practice is concept and knowledge. In the sense of being free, the practice is material strength which is different with the understanding. The material strength wants to surpass from the understanding; the surpassing from the congition and beginning to struggle for changing the status. The breakout is similar to the absolute idea"releasing out of itself as the nature from itself"in form. The understanding activity is able to include completely the practice, and put it in the closed and inbeing of the conscious fundamentally. The practice activities and the understanding activity always are the objectivity relationship which is"the practice equal to the understanding". Base on the solid practice, Marx philosophy epistemology realizes the understanding and the practice's objective unification. The second part compares with the ideas of the understanding grasping the practice of Marx, Heidegger. Viewing Marx's philosophy from living theory helps us more profoundly realize of the humanistic sense of marx's philosophy, and avoids to understand mechanically and dogmatically Marx's philosophy thoughts.Chapter 5: the deepening research of the modern philosophy about In the different and objectivity relationship with the understanding and the practice. This chapter introduces that the modern western philosophy deeply study on the heterogeneity and objectivity ideas under the influence of the understanding and grasping the practice of Kant, Marx and Heidegger. They are heterogeneity ideas of concept and content which is not concept of Adorno's, Gadamer's hermenentics, and the daily language analytic philosophy of the later Wittgenstein, etc.Conclusion: Kant's"thing-in-itself"heterogeneity idea puts forward"realizes it that not to been met"and"see the thing which not to been watched", and obligate space for the heterogeneous practice; Marx has inherited critically Kant's philosophy, and realizes the heterogeneity of the unified of the understanding and the practice, realizes the transcendence of the practice from the understanding, solves really Epistemological problems, pointed out the direction for human liberation. Reading Marx's philosophy from the Heidegger's subsistence helps better us to avoid to understand mechanically and dogmatically Marx's philosophy thoughts.