"transformation Of Style" Dynasty

In the end of the Zhou Dynasty ,'The Book of Songs" was changed from gracefulness to express one's emotion by the huge historical changges. It was named "ZhengBian" by"MaoShi"."The changing of Feng and Ya"came from it. "MaoShi" is better than"SanJiaShi" in this way. But, in this way to learn "The Book of Songs" must add historical facts to the poems, it must be farfectched. As a result, "The changing of Feng and Ya"have full of holes.My article borrows this concept, wants to study it in a new angle of view, to prove the relationship of "The Book of Song" and the history.There are two parts in my article:The first part,including the first and the second chapter,belongs to the study of "The Book of Songs".The second part,including the third,forth,fifth and sixth chapter,is to explain the poems of "The changing of Feng and Ya" in historical way. My article have maken some breakthrough on the foundation of others'study:In the foreword,1 size up the vale of historical datas of "The Book of Songs". In my article, I summarize the history of studying "The Book of Songs" in historical ways,and divide the history into three parts.However,poem is not history.Studying "The Book of Songs" in historical ways must pay attention to its truthfulness and reliability. Using this way to inspect the ancient society must consult the other documents and the archaeological datas Before the Qin Dynasty.In the first chapter, I analayse the advancement of "ZhengBian",and firmly believe that "ZhengBian" has no relationship with "SanJianShi". I conclude that "The changing of Feng and Ya" in"MaoShi" is an important theory. It developed the mucical theory in "ZuoZhuan", "XunZi"and "LiJi".Meanwhile,I show clearly that "ZhengBian" has so many physical defects.Its'dividing standard isn't scientific.In the second chapter, I inspect the historical origin of "ZhengBian" from the new published book-"KongZiShiLun". I recognize that "ZhengBian" is not the castles in the air, and it is closly interrelated with the general mood of using "The Book of Songs" before the Qin Dynasty.In the third chapter,I size up the historical soil of "The changing of Feng and Ya", and conclude the times when the poems were written.Most of the poems'written times have been judged.In my article,I sum up the spirit of "The changing of Feng and Ya" on the whole, and analyse the aesthetical consciousness of the poems of "The changing of Feng and Ya".In the forth chapter, I inquire into the regional feature of the "GuoFeng".According to "ZhengBian", "ErNan" belongs to "ZhengFeng",the other kinds of "Feng" belong to "BianFeng". I think the pattern of "ZhengBian" is so rigid. Except the difference of written times, the difference of region is another way to analyse "The Book of Songs".In the fifth chapter, the mew published book-"KongZiShiLun", "GuoFeng" is named as "BangFeng".Not only "GuoFeng", but also "BangFeng", disclose information to us that "The Book of Songs" has closely relationship to the city life of the Zhou Dynasty.This viewpoint is different from the viewpoint which says "the poems in 'The Book of Songs' are all folk songs". I conlude that the writers of "The Book of Songs" are not the labouring people, and the poems in "The Book of Songs" are not folk songs.In the sixth chapter, I analyse the changing of spirit of the Zhou Dynasty. In philosophy, I explain the changing of "TianMing" idea, and conlude that the changing of clansman idea in "The Book of Songs".And I conclude the changing of the musical idea in the book too. Music imperceptibly influenced people in that time. So, we must pay closeattention to it in the study.From the series of analyses, we can see that the styles of "The Book of Songs" changed in the 500 years.We can clearly see the history of the Spring and Autumn Dynasty in the poems of "The changing of Feng and Ya".In my discusstion,I use the reseach ways as transverse setion,comparating in depth and prooving literature and history each other.The "transverse setion" is to selet the poems in the Spring...