The Deconstruction From The Outside The Monologues And The Dialogues

The philosophy of Plato has constructed the inside purity after excluding the outside from his Idea of the philosophy and finally the author has discovered the so-called monologue. At the same time, there is also the trace of the outside in his philosophy which is discovered by Derrida. But, the deconstruction of Derrida, which attempts to deconstruct the ontology of the philosophy, is still a kind of deconstruction from the inside or in the margin of the ontology of philosophy. So the deconstruction of Derrida is only the one from the inside. But, the French philosophers in the last century that attempted to look for the Other of the western philosophy and the French sinologists that studied the Chinese thought have verified the heterogeneity between the Chinese thought and the western philosophy. So, the other of the western philosophy, it is just the Chinese thought according to Francois Jullien and the deconstruction from the outside has its histories of the conditions.There is also the other monologue, exactly, the mono-tao shared by the Confucian and the Taoist in the Chinese tradition. However, the author has already discovered the trace of the outside that is just the conscience of the subject that is excluded from the mono-tao and that is developed in the western philosophy. The creation of Lu Xun, in fact, has developed this concept in his works. And the author attempts to awaken the conscience of the subject via the western philosophy so that it is able to get rid of the history of the mono-tao in order to vitalize the Chinese thought.So, the author attempts to continue with this thought of the deconstruction from the outside in the sino-philosoher that holds two positions of the Chinese thought and of the western philosophy in order to respond to the questions from the sinologist and the philosopher. In a word, the work of the sino-philosopher has freed the Chinese thought from its history and freed the western philosophy from its Ground by the deconstruction from the outside. The author attempts to get this conclusion that the deconstruction of the outside has shaken off the philosophical method and becomes strategic, and has broken away the critique from the inside and becomes a kind of the critique from the outside.