In The Ming Dynasty Agriculture Investigate To This Thought

China is a traditional agricultural country, agricultural development, rural progress, problems of farmers has been fundamentally affecting the social and economic development of China. Economic Thought in Ancient China as the most basic and most important part of the re-evolution of economic thought agriculture embodies the national economic and social development process, in turn, on the economic and social development has played an important influence. Delve into heavy agricultural economic thinking on the role of national economic and social development will not only help to understand Chinese society in the history of many problems, you can also explore agricultural development paths of today has important reference value. This thesis is selected this period Ming Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty representative figures presented emphasizing agriculture as the center of economic thought, in accordance with the character of the historical background, class attributes, such as the different personal experiences to explore, analyze its effects on heavy agricultural Economic Thought concerns different angles, revealing their ideas into policy or practice that reflects the unique and diverse social effects, and discover its revelation agricultural development in today’s society.Ming dynasties, China’s commodity economic development into another peak, and with the increasing Western economic and cultural exchanges, Ming opened a Chinese history and world history, mingled with and a new chapter begins by the "regional history" forward "the world history,"the historical process. It is in this case, the Ming stressing agricultural economy with a strong tradition of thinking the concept of color farming, but also to adapt to new trends in the development of commodity economy and the "Agriculture and Commerce both" transformation. Both Chinese traditional thought of agriculture continued development and beyond, but also cultural exchange shining sparks of the collision.Ming heavy agricultural economic thinking is the official China joint effort. Zhu Yuanzhang, Qiu Jun, WangYangMing,ZhangJuZheng,XuGuangQi and others from the perspective of their own class, respectively, rulers, bureaucrats arid literati perspective on agriculture, rural areas and farmers in-depth thinking and practice, and they were on agriculture giving adequate priority to the development at the same time, there are focused on, such as the emperor’s policy approach focusing on agricultural development and the building of social order. Qiu Jun and ZhangJuZheng thought of agriculture more with the "equal emphasis on agro-business" and "thick Nongli business" colors, WangYangMing focused on the development of the external environment as an agricultural development of rural governance, but by the impact of Western science and technology, XuGuangqi on the importance of agriculture through science and technology has given full attention. From different angles on agricultural development thinking, making emphasis on agriculture is no longer limited to simple agricultural areas, but more from the entire agriculture, rural areas and farmers in areas of agriculture and economic development to be taken into account multiple perspectives and grasp, thus promoting the re-farming of traditional Chinese New Development of Economic Thought.The Ideas of Ming Agricultural proposed by the ruling class, on behalf of the landlord class ideology, the essence was to maintain the stability of the regime ruling class, with the feudal limitations, and also was a traditional Chinese thought of agriculture inheritance and development. Due to its special social-economic background, Ming stressing agricultural tthoughts also has different ways of thinking and pragmatic nature of duality from traditional agriculture.Compared with the idea of the French Physiocrats, we can see that both of these two ideas emphasized the importance of agriculture, but do not deny the social function of business. Though Ming heavy agricultural economic thought and ideas were in the Physiocrats similarities, they also essentially different. The heavy agricultural economic thought during this period was a product of "the monarchy agribusiness community", but also a pair of Western intellectual heritage of traditional agriculture inheritance and beyond, on the current China’s "three rural" problems have important lessons enlightenment.