The Acception History Of Caozhi And His Works Before The Tang Dynasty

Based on the analysis of Caozhi research, especially on the analysis of the study of Caozhi nearly a century of history, the paper try to write a Caozhis accepting history, in the light of western reception, and according to the textual reserach. This thesis consists of five chapter except the introduction.The introduction part includs two aspects:The first section is to identify the problem and the blind spots through clearing up research history and current situation of Caozhis accepting study, to provide the literature basis and direction instruction; The second section is to determine the problems that the paper needs to solve, for example, Caozhis influence on creation, Caozhis acception of the important readers, the track of acception of Caozhi and his works, to discuss the cause, significance, basic thought train of choosing the subject, the structure and the research technique of the paper.Chapter1mainly discusses three aspect problems:First, to discuss the acception of Caocao, Caopi, Caorui and their hierarchy for Caozhi. The Caocao Groups acception for Caozhi is based on the fighting for the Caowei,s heirdom between Caopi and Caozhi, Caozhi is a heck of the political struggle within Caowei ruling circle. In a way, Caozhi,s failure in the struggle on the succession to the throne is the defeat of Caocao and his Group. As to the acception of Caopi and Caorui for Caozhi, the paper explain the reason that Caopi keep silent throughout for Caozhis talent, and discuss the facts that Caorui approach his ancle Caozhi in emotional range, and accept his advice about Caowei s political strategy to a certain extent.Second, to discuss the acceptance situation of Caozhi in this historical moment from JianAn to ZhengShi. This part mainly solves two questions:On the one hand, by analyzing the ideas, creation and achievements about the poems and odes of Jian An, the paper reveals that Caopi s silence for Caozhis literature implies his opinion of literary criticism; On the other hand, Caorui is the first one to learn from Caozhis woks, which is very important in the history of Caozhis acception.Third, By making a case study of Ruanji, to discuss the inheritance and evaluation Ruanji from Caozhi.Chapter2mainly discusses two aspect problems:First, The main stream Academics in the western Jin and estern Jin Dynasties do further study into Caozhis works, the unique feature of the literary arena of the west Jin Dynasty can be traced to their study from Caozhi’s woks. And literators at that time study Caozhi,s works in many ways, like poems, verses, memorial, praise, painting theory, etc. Because of the continuously imitating to the same work of Caozhi, some works of Caozhi begin to attain canonical status.Second, This part discusses the Caozhis acception of Fuxuan, Zhanghua, Luji with special chapters. Fuxuans study various style forms from Caozhi, who has a broader field of vision that leads the development direction of the literature in west Jin Dynasty. Zhanghua mainly studies the rangers subject of Caozhi s works, which reflects his desire for strength as a prime minister in a dark ages. And Luji keep interesting for Caozhi s YueFu poems.Chapter3discusses the acception about Caozhi and his works in Northern and Southern Dynasties. And in this case about the acception of Caozhi s works, there are four features:from the synthetical acception of the whole in Southern Song Dyansty to the generalized acception, to the trivial acception, and from the study about Caozhi s expression of emotion to the acception of sensuality, and the family or group influence each other. For the part about the acception of Caozhi, this pepole, there are four features too:Religionization, Historization, Literalization, Moralization.Chapter4discusses Caozhi s acception of literary interpretation about Caozhis works. First, Liuxie thinks that the most important things Caozhi abtained was his poems and memorials, and from this perspective who can be good at different kinds of articles, Caozhi is behind Wangcan, Luji. Liuxie first raised the issue that they are of about the same talent between Caopi and Caozhi. Xiaotong is not in agreement on these issues. Second, this paper reinterprets the idea proposed by Zhongrong that Caozhis works are the source of works created by LUji and Xielingyun., on which the academic circle has been debating for so long a time. In fact, Zhongrong’s theory about source is not the objective truth based on the complete works of Caozhi. He creats his theory only according to a little part of their works, which serves his poetic ideal to correct the shortcoming of that era.Chapter5chooses Xielingyun, Jiangyan, Shenyue, Xiaoyi as the study partcipants, it is very important that they accept Caozhi and his woks in the history of Caozhi acception. They find the spirit and emotion of Caozhi and his works, which has a profound impact.