From Interest Conception Of History To Capitalist Criticism

This dissertation aims to reveal that Marx’s class theory has realized "ParadigmRevolution" with respect to the old class theory which is represented by the historian’sclass theory of the Bourbon restoration period, and strive to grasp the "rational core"of Marx’s class theory for in response to the challenge which put forward bycontemporary western theory circle.Kuhn’s paradigm theory is established on the reaction to the scientific conceptionof logical empiricism.On the premise of subject-object dichotomy view of nature andwith "covering-law model" as the basic logic framework,Logical empiricism constructa cumulative and progressive scientific development prospect. Kuhn is opposed to thisview of science, through the study of the history of science, Kuhn found that thedevelopment of science is the scientific revolution, in order to explain the noncumulative, revolution in science development prospect, Kuhn put forward the theoryof paradigm. Kuhn is using a paradigm in the two sense, is a comprehensive, is a local,comprehensive paradigm is a complex structure, including "the metaphysics as partof" paradigm of the model, as the cognitive orientation tool symbolic generalizationreconciliation example.The concept of "paradigm" has been widely used in the research field of thephilosophy of Marx which has made some valuable research results, but there are alsosome problems that is to borrow the concept of "paradigm" in time because of thelack of necessary prerequisite introspection caused concept refers to is not clear.Research paradigm boundary reflection of Marx’s philosophy aims to explorereasonable research path reveal Marx philosophy contemporary significance in thenew era under the condition of. Marx’s philosophy and Marx philosophy contemporary revolutionary is the two aspects of the same problem, the contemporarysignificance of Marx’s philosophy should highlight to fully understand Marx’sphilosophy is the premise of the revolutionary. The performance of Marx’s philosophyis revolutionary Marx philosophy to modern western philosophy realized theparadigm revolution. Paradigm Revolution paradigm revolution of Marx’s classtheory to realize the whole philosophy of Marx.The class theory of the historian’s of Bourbon restoration period is the highestpeak in the old class theory.The Bourbon restoration period special political,economic and cultural background created prosperity of history in thisperiod,represented by Guizot,Thierry and Minie,the historians of Bourbon restorationperiod taking class struggle as the basic theoretical framework to explain the historyof modern France and Europe as a whole, the class struggle as the motive force ofhistorical progress. Historians class theory is not the restoration of the original, thedevelopment of their own to progressive argumentation to the bourgeois democraticrevolution as the theme of the class struggle theory based on inheriting the old classtheory, deepen the understanding of the reasons for the formation of class, decisiveclearly points out that class struggle is the motive force of historical progress, makethe historical role of the class the struggle of the well known, reached the highest peakof the old class theory.For Kuhn, the integrated paradigm includes three primary parts, are model,symbolic generalization and exemplars. Using the paradigm theory to grasp thehistorian’s class theory of restoration period, model mainly for the school of historiansshare the view of the world view of history, social history research methods and theylocated the same value position. Symbolic generalization performance as they hold aset of conceptual framework of history, the conceptual framework and its view of theworld view of history and social history research method body construction, they usethe concept frame of the seemingly messy historical grasp as a rule. Paradigm isembodied as they use a particularly successful works of class theory interpretation ofhistory, in these works, the history research in the restoration period historians view ofthe world view of history and social history research method and value position got the perfect embodiment, become a model for other historians of imitation. Therefore,we mainly through the classics analysis of this school of thought embodied in thecommon view of the world view of history and social history research method andvalue position of the restoration period historians class theory hold for a "paradigm".The French restoration historian class theory world outlook outlook on history is ahistory which interests, resulting in the conflict of interests of intuitive class struggleas the motive force of historical development, thus proves the rationality of thebourgeois democratic revolution, the paradox of rationality and environment of thiskind of conception of history finally in eighteenth Century and French materialism inthe same people’s mutual decision; in this interest history as the basis, the method ofsocial history research is an intuitive, non historical research methods; valuestandpoint, a historian of French restoration is self-conscious bourgeois spokesmen.Marx’s class theory has realized Paradigm Revolution with respect to thehistorian’s class theory of the Bourbon restoration period. This first reflected in theworldview and the concept of history of Marx’s class theory, Marx is not by means of"human nature" to understand the relationship between man and the world any more,but the relationship between "the human practice and in the comprehension of thispractice" treat people with the world; the process of historical development is nolonger through conflict of interest subjects to complete the "God’s plan", but therelationship formed by the "sensuous human activities" reality. Secondly embody therevolution in the social history research method of Marx’s class theory, unlike theFrench restoration period historians of the class theory of intuitive and non historicalresearch methods, study of Marx’s method to a large number of facts relationship andactual life phenomenon is the basis and premise, to explore the general nature of theprovisions of the abstract and contact from them and then to the reasonable abstractfor reproducing the premise of realizing the theory of concrete, so as to grasp theessence of capitalism was covered by the provisions of false representation. Finally,changes in the value reflected the position of Marx’s theory of class, Marx is standingin the bourgeois criticism standpoint, is the representative of the proletarian class. Theconception of history and the "social history research method of concrete-Abstract- concrete" is based on the new view of the world, Marx constructs an overall critiqueof capitalism as the historical materialism theory, reveals the capitalist historicallimitations and inherent transcendence, realized the paradigm revolution.Marx’s class theory have to face severe challenge in the contemporary era, thesechallenges can be attributed to the demise of the proletariat to a certain extent. In thebackground of the globalized capitalism,opinion of demise of the proletariat has itsbasis in fact, but fundamentally speaking, this view is rooted in the class theory ofMarx’s outlook on the world view of history and social history research method andvalue position back, can not understand the relationship between class theory andMarx’s theory of the old classes in the van type the height of the revolution, can notcorrectly understand the true nature of the theory of Marx’s class theory.Writing a newhistorical conditions of proletariat in the contemporary, we should adhere to the basicprinciple of major historical materialism, but also through the appropriate way todeepen it, in order to respond to the demise of the proletariat more effectively,providetheoretical support for the proletarian political rise again.