The Emergence And Debate Of Chinese Proletariat Revolution Literature

The research object of this paper lies in Chinese proletarian revolutionary literature advocacy which occurred in 1920s last century. The introductory chapter remarked the revolutionary literature research history after the Great Cultural Revolution up to now, which can approximately be divided into three stages, each stage all has its characteristics which is different from other stages. The first chapter has combed the revolutionary literature emergence process. The May 30th Movement formed a boundary between the former and the after phases, during the first phase, early Communist takes "Chinese youth" as a ford, revealed the prelude driving the literary circles to change direction; During the second phase, the imperialism cruelty and the labor movement being raging like a storm urged writers step off an "ivory tower" , arrive in "crossroad", paying close attention to reality which is interweaved by "blood" and "tear", Literati such as Jiang guang ci , Guo mo ruo whose theory advocacy and Literary works have had an important influence, delicate change has happened on the centre of gravity that the literary circles shows attention. Second chapters analysed dissensions between the revolution literature debate rival groups. After great revolution failed, the left wing personage is forced to arrive at Shanghai from all over the country and engaged in literature work again, later Chuang Zao She members who has returned back to homeland brought forward "the proletarian revolution literature " slogan and raised "the revolution literature debate ", the opposite sides divergence is concentrated on the definition of literature, author and subject three aspects. Third chapter discussed an important inclination in revolution literature: the "Revolution + love " formula. The first section pointed out the reason why the pattern's popular? I think it's relevant to writers' experience, subject matter as well as urban background three elements. Besides, I think so-called "the wrong inclination" that the researcher in the past criticizes for revolution literature being exactly the inevitable result of mass culture . The second section took several typical novels as case, pointing out the proletariat as history body how to become mature in revolution literary works ,while the bourgeoisie intellectual is experiencing the conflict in "revolution" and "being in love" .Originally, they can only choose one of them, then the two parallels subsequently , love becomes revolution's driving force. Fourth chapters have summed up the accomplishment and deficiency of proletarian revolution literature, discussing revolution literature experience which is worthy to draw and shortcoming which need to be improved for Chinese left wing literature in future. I think city acquired a layer of "negative" significance in revolution literature even left wing literary works in future.