New Vision Academic Research By Guodian Bamboo Slips And Pre-Qin Philosophers

The sixteen kinds of Pre-Qin bamboo literatures unearthed in Hubei Guodian, which across Confucianism, Taoism, Mohist and cover the three main Confucian representative Confucius, Zisi, Mencius. There are another group of valuable Pre-Qin new materials following after the bamboo slips Sunbin’s Art of War and Lunyu and the silk book Laozi. Through the study of Guodian bamboo slips, not only help us directly address some of the Pre-Qin philosophers puzzle, but also inspire new Pre-Qin philosophers research vision. Provide more effective and feasible solutions to solve the problem of Pre-Qin philosophers.Discrimination in the academic aspects of Confucian thought, Guodian bamboo slip Zundeyi not only appear the same sentence "People can make an example guide, not only to know" with Lunyu, but also provide background. After study, we found that this sentence is like to express "lead by example", instead of "fooling".Guodian bamboo slips Lumugongwenzisi clearly document Zisi’s words and deeds. It’s seldom paty of "Simeng School" literature after lost. So that we can directly see the style and ideas from Zisi. Through in-depth analysis, we can find Lumugongwenzisi’s style mode widespread in Lunyu, Xunzi and Yanzichunqiu. There are a variety of other Pre-Qin philosophers close relationship with Zisi’s loyalists idea "Often point out the king’s fault". That Lumugongwenzisi is "Simeng School" thinking achievements, also is Pre-Qin comprehensive reflection of academic trends. As for Guodian bamboo slips Chengzhiwenzhi’s say: "Others will respect ourselves after respect them" and Zundeyi’s say:"Zhou failure by Yu’s people, and Tang success by Zhou’s people" and Qiongdayishi’s ancient sages deeds, are different from other Pre-Qin literature. In other word, it’s a preference for Pre-Qin philosophers thought by Guodian tomb.Discrimination in the academic aspects of Laozi thought, Guodian bamboo slip Laozi have lot of differents with modern Laozi. Provides a wide range of text foundation to understand Laozi’s national construction. Let us know that not only different with Taixue, but also different with Chuangcius and Hanfeizi. Laozi’s national construction is based on "Tao" So we can use this way to analysis the background of Laozi’s "Small country and population" and "Treasure of the country can’t be shown to the people". The result is performance salvation thought form Laozi. So we can find that background is wery important to understand Pre-Qin philosophers’ advocate.Discrimination in terms of academic thought and Mohist, as for Yusong-si bamboo slips say:"Little thieves are hanged, but great ones escape" look like form Chuangcius. Indeed, these comments are form Motse. It tell us can not just focus on one school, ignore the similarities and differences in Pre-Qin philosophers research.. And Yusong-si reflect a huge difference between minor between the Pre-Qin philosophers. So we can use this way to analysis what Taoism say "body is more important than anything". Indeed, this opinion is interception form Mohist. And Mohist’s point is reference form Confucianism, too.Final, we can integrate these aspects to study Pre-Qin philosophers’ special definition method. They don’t change the original words, but give new meaning to words.This shows, Pre-Qin philosophers division is not demarcated what we think of. Academic history and relationship are also blurred between them. Even frequent some phenomenon of mistaken identity. Some familiar Pre-Qin philosophers point of view has yet to be further clarified. By the way of through all scholars, go into the background and identify similarities and differences, we can cleanup these issues to a certain extent. Restore the true face of the Pre-Qin philosophers thought.