| Abstract:[Objective] Through literature, we analysis of trends in environmental legislation and international mental health legislation mental health legislation. Through our evaluation of specialized mental health legislation, find out differences in our mental health legislations and the differences with international standards.[Methods] The study is divided into theoretical and empirical research in two parts. Theoretical studies using literature research method, analysis of China on the basis of mental health legislation, analysis of the number of mental health resources, management, configuration and input, and foreign mental health legislation, and International Organization for mental health legislation requirements and Jurisprudence foundation, and the process of china mental health legislation. The method of using comparative jurisprudence, the study Compare china mental health legislation and international requirements for mental health legislation. Using the Delphi method we get the27categories of index weights. Specific steps are1. Established forecasting group, Panel members have five people, including one professor, one associate professor, three lecturers. The professor and the associate professor engaged in the study of mental health experts. They have a wealth of experience, proficiency in the application of Delphi method and capacity of prediction, evaluation and analysis;2. Select Expert based on the subject of this study. Experts are engaged in mental health research, mental health management and legal.3. Statement issued by registered mail inquiry letter and e-mail, Table mail order to ensure the accuracy and efficiency of the recovery, recycling predetermined period. Data input EXCEL letter after the first round of consultation will be obtained, Statistical analysis by SPSS18.0. Through results a second round of letters asking roll timely pay to the experts. Empirical studies using comprehensive evaluation method for China comprehensive evaluation of mental health legislation. Specific steps are1. The "Checklist World Health Organization on mental health legislation" translated into Chinese through language and mental health experts examined and modified.2.using focus groups to get our eight specialized mental health legislation score. If the evaluation is inconsistent, they will get discussions and consensus. If you are unable to reach a consensus, evaluation conclusions drawn by voting.3. With a comprehensive index method and TOPSIS method to comprehensive evaluation China eight specialized mental health legislation.[Results] The main results of this study:1. Confucian "benevolence" idea is to treat our patients with mental disorders and their related legislative history and tradition, the history of our country to treat mental disorders and legislative practice and sometimes on the generosity of people with mental disorders in contradiction.2. The provisions of general law of mental disorders do for the in principle, is the basis for our mental health legislation.3. The mental health resources are fewer and unequal distribution.4. Abroad generally have mental health legislation from limiting mental disorders to protect social order to protect the rights of people with mental disorders mental transformation process. International standards of mental health legislation is an inherent requirement of modern jurisprudence.5. There are some differences between china mental health legislation and international standards, mainly in the procedural provisions and implementing rules gaps. Some of the main differences is the reality of China’s national conditions and cultural traditions caused differences.6. National mental health legislation has the highest score in eight specialized comprehensive evaluation of mental health legislation, the other seven specialized mental health legislation have not much difference.[Conclusion]1. Our mental health legislation is substantially the same basic content, in line with World Health Organization standards. In terms of supervision and investigation mechanism, housing and social security they have differences.2. Local mental health legislation and national mental health legislation there are more differences between the corresponding need to modify the corresponding provisions of the legislature or explanation.3. National mental health legislation significantly is better than local mental health legislation. There are more differences in mental health legislation and national mental health legislation, Special in involuntary medical treatment. Legal provisions need to be modified or interpreted.4. Many of the provisions of mental health legislation lacks operational procedural requirements, the need to develop appropriate measures for implementation. |
PDF Full Text Request