Chinese Students Korean Auxiliary Acquisition And Bias

Chinese students in learning Korean generally feel most difficult to master the various usage and grammatical meaning is auxiliary. Especially in a sentence different utterances to distinguish the different grammatical meaning and the meaning of the sentence. This paper investigation, analyzed the Chinese college students learning Korean utterances of the errors. The biggest reason why Chinese students this bias phenomenon can be divided into two broad categories. The first is influenced by Chinese mother tongue, Chinese and Korean word order and grammar usage is different. The second is South Korea's vp internal interference, because the usage of Korean case of utterances is very complex is relatively easy to misuse. For Chinese students to learn Korean partical periodically analysis of errors, and adopt corresponding countermeasures for reasons, not only can effectively improve the level of Korean students, and can help teachers find better Korean teaching strategy. In this paper, using the perspective of cognitive linguistics research ideas and methods proved this point.First, this paper discusses the utterances of the category and grammatical function. The full text altogether five parts.The first part, introduced in this paper, the research scope, research purpose and significance,research objects and research status; The second part, the Chinese students studying Korean case of utterances of Chinese prepositions and corresponding Korean case of utterances were analyzed; The third part, the Chinese students learning Korean supreme and bias of the highest utilization rate in case of utterances of nominative auxiliary analysis of the errors. This chapter first analysis nominative auxiliary "(?)(yi) /(?)(ga)" in the sentence grammatical function and semantic relations, also points and subsidy term "(?)(ean) /(?) (nean)" bias and usage. In Korean grammar, auxiliary was divided into the lattice of utterances and subsidies, believe that particles are only bore grammatical functions while subsidies word semantic function. But such grammatical categories is good for Chinese students do not understand two auxiliary function and semantic differences. Some of the recent primary Korean teaching research is the nominative of utterances and subsidies words into the same pragmatic category, emphasizes the utterances of the pragmatic level. But the two sentences as connection degree is different, and grammatical relations is very close. Nominative utterances and subsidy term bias in the process, the subject and topic are cognitive linguistics point of view, and specific function of partical partical has highlighted the subject and topic. The fourth part, analysis,through the Chinese students use adverbs, auxiliary "(?)"(e) / (?)(eseo)" analysis of the errors,identify the reasons for errors. This chapter according to the theory of mother tongue dry involving Beijing in detail. Fogg auxiliary "(?) (e)" and "(?)" (eseo)" is the scope of application is mine in the Korean case of utterances.From the perspective of a learning stage of primary and secondary students have the highest rate of errors frequency and errors. Deputy division of utterances bias types, left the highest rate of errors in its lowest replace errors. The fifth part, the objective of utterances. The fifth part, the objective of utterances"(?)(eul /(?) (reul)" and bias of the acquisition and statistical analysis. Chinese students accusative utterances of the bias is the biggest reason of mother tongue interference. Of Korean and Chinese word order is different, "object + predicate + auxiliary, type internal syntactic structure type."Subject-predicate structure "and" "bing" structure even in the most errors in predicate location errors.In general, Chinese Korean word order of the largest tea the position of the object. Object location in Korean sentence before he verbs. For Chinese students to learn Korean accusative partical encounter one of the reasons for the difficulties in the errors analysis. Therefore,teachers should be in Korean auxiliary teaching process, select the appropriate teaching methods and strategies to help students to solve the problem of bias.By receiving and analysis, this paper has the following three aspects of innovative:1. To collect the good spoken English corpus of Chinese students writing different types of language points, through the analysis of the Han Guoge utterances bias phenomenon. Lattice of utterances are divided into various in Korean as grammatical functions respectively, points belong to different grammatical category, but the Korean learners how to understand and use in a chaotic state.In teachers in the teaching process, should not be simple just to illustrate from the perspective of syntax, and echo relationship should need repeatedly and circulating sex education.2. The usage of Korean case of utterances is very complex. In China students of high rate of errors in second language acquisition one of them. Especially the misuse of the highest proportion between lattice of utterances. Analyses the reasons of misuse, first understand the conditions of the students. The teaching cannot one-time all need gradation teaching to students.3. In order to help to avoid errors of utterances, Chinese students need a combination of teaching.Korean auxiliary teaching should cooperate with each other and the sentence pattern teaching.Particles in the primary stage of learning, the only emphasize natural said in spoken Chinese errors often occur in the teaching of the phenomenon. In the process of oral expression of Korean, often omit lattice of utterances. Although allow it some expressions in spoken English. But learning Korean primary teaching, the training is applied to the written language. The purpose of this writing is to reduce because of the difference of Chinese and Korean system of partical bias. Hope to be able to help in primary learners of Korean and Korean teacher. In addition, and perhaps more effective teaching method to exist, it is necessary to do further in the future exploration and research.