| This paper studied the paradox between "legal"and "reasonable",which of the feminist movement in the1930’s narrative,and rethink the historical essence of Chinese literature.There are six charpters.The introductionr mainly focuses on the general overview of the feminist struggle in the 1930s,and introduces the relevant research results and the purpose and significance of this paper.Chapt I focuses on the analysis of the abolishing movement and the modern literary narrative.Chapte Ⅱ lis mainly to the marriage reform of the government of the republic of China in the 1930’s and the related literary narrative.ChapterⅢis mainly for those narrative which about the young women workers and waitress and policewomen.ChapterIVfocuses on the daily life of women in the 1930’s,which focused the"legs" of the female aesthetic to show the complex relationship between state power and modernization.ChapterVis a conclusion,which pointed out that China’s feminist movement,which is dominateg by male as a subordinate part,which determine the Chinese male color and state ideology of the feminist discourse features,also determines the men thought of Chinese feminist narrative characteristics.With the absence of women and the lack of female experience,the feminist expression of modern literature presents the paradox of writing and truth.And the emergence of these paradoxes,is due to the penetration of politics,power,revolution,state,nation,culture,gender and so on.Therefore,the study on the 1930’s feminist discourse and literary imagination/female narrative,is a indispensable important way to the understanding and analysis of Chinese literature in the 20th century. |