Research On The Third Party Assessment Of Government Purchasing Public Sports Service

The emergence of new public management and new public service theory has prompted a worldwide administrative reform.With the reform direction of "big society and small government”,all countries have carried out innovative measures aimed at transforming the government functions.The core is the government purchase service;the government can play the social organization's affinity to the people and the efficiency of the market organization by seeking cooperation with the society and the market.Government purchase is a choice after the market failure of the government supply model,the government failure of the social supply model and the multi cooperative supply model.The transformation of supply model shows that facing the public demand of diversity and variability,we need flexible supply model,and the government purchase service is a way to achieve this way of supply.Under the combined of government function transformation,internal strength,purchasing power,external force,social progress and policy support,our government has been promoting the purchase of public sports service.However,due to the lack of government purchase evaluation theory and the lag of practice,the purchase has not been effectively defined,which has affected the extensive development of purchase activities.Therefore,it is very necessary to establish a set of government to purchase public sports service evaluation mechanism.The evaluation of our government's purchase of public sports service is mainly organized by the government departments,and the government's role of "buyer","supervisor" and "evaluator".The credibility of the evaluation is questioned.Evaluation has become a weak link and is deeply in the dilemma of lack of credibility in system evaluation,lack of independence outside the evaluation system,unilateralism of evaluation objects,lack of comprehensiveness of evaluation contents,and lack of integrity in the evaluation process.There are many problems such as incomplete assessment,imperfect evaluation and poor evaluation methods.These problems are reflected in the following aspects: the main body of evaluation is the government,the object of evaluation is the undertaker,the evaluation method is internal,and the evaluation index is result oriented.The causes of the problem can be summarized as follows: incomplete government functions and the purchase evaluation system,immature the evaluation of theory and practice,and evaluation of information asymmetry.Combined with the evaluation experience of developed countries,the problems can be solved by speeding up the transformation of government functions,increasing theoretical research and practical exploration,and speeding up the construction of evaluation system.The key is to establish the evaluation system based on the third partyThe third-party evaluation of government purchase of public sports service is based on specific environment.It not only promotes the transformation of government functions,also have the needs of solving practical problems,and drawing lessons from international experience.In this paper,through the analysis of the SWOT-PEST analysis,stakeholder analysis and balance mechanism and stability mechanism,pointed out that the third-party evaluation is external supervision mechanism,the government purchased sports service should be applied,not only can solve a series ofproblems caused "self-evaluation",also conducive to change the government function in sports,public sports service is a sign of maturity.After establishing the concept of third party evaluation of public sports service,this article from the group of the evaluation organ,evaluation the operation of the security and process of supervision from three aspects,to build the government purchasing public sports service mechanism of the third-party evaluation.The government performance evaluation can be divided into three types:general performance,organization performance and special performance evaluation.In countries such as Britain and the United States to buy analysis service special assessment framework,the framework for the classification of government purchase of sports service evaluation: one is to determine the scope of the evaluation framework,including a comprehensive assessment of the macro level and micro level of project evaluation,and according to the level of government to evaluate,administrative division and other industry categories.Two,according to the evaluation framework determined by the purchase process,through the evaluation of each link,improve the performance of each link,to improve the overall performance.The three is the evaluation framework based on stakeholders,including undertaker and buyer's purchase performance,receiver's satisfaction and another participants' evaluation.The four is the overall assessment framework determined by the system theory,the systematic inspection of the whole process of purchase.Finally,trinity evaluation framework covering the main body,process and scope of purchase the characteristics of government purchase are put forward,and the evaluation points of purchasers,preceptors,recipients and purchase contents are analyzed respectively.As the “trinity “of the subcontractors as the research object,around the choice to undertake the organization as the reason,the significance of the assessment object,undertake the organization positioning and evolution,undertake the theoretical basis of establishing organization evaluation model,index system design and practice in the aspects of this view.To undertake the organization to assess the social organization evaluation theory,organization of manufacturers in the supply chain evaluation of supplier selection theory,MC Kinsey ability theory and project management theory as the theoretical foundation,these theoretical results is the "AGMS" model and the design of index system of theoretical support.In the theory,combined with the static "Pyramid principle","dynamic capability theory","ecological theory" and Moor's "strategic triangle" model,on the basis of the "structure function" thought,according to the political legitimacy,management effectiveness and ability competency,undertaking the organization selection into the qualifications,four dimensions of organizational governance,management level and service capabilities,is to undertake the organization selection of the "AGMS" evaluation model.This relationship has a hierarchical ascending from four aspects: the qualification of focus on the organization's legal review,to access threshold effect;organizational governance for internal governance,measure the bidding organization operation and standardization degree;management level to the organization framework as the foundation,reflect the running situation,the core is to examine the validity of management;service ability is the ultimate security organization.On the basis of the model,to carry out indicators research work: the first is to analyze policy text based on the national,local and industry level regulations,undertake qualification organization;the second is based on the analysis of local practice,put forward to undertake the organization selection reference;the third is based on the results of analysis of literature,indicators to undertake assessment organization.The selection of the undertaking organization is a screening and management activity with value judgement.The design of index system should adhere to the principles of "setting according to law","objective neutrality","emphasizing the key points",and laying equal stress on the process and the result.The evaluation index system of the choice of public sports service providers is mainly established through the following steps: Firstly,the index is established by combining literature learning in related fields,brainstorming of experts,policy text analysis and practical experience.Secondly,through the two rounds of Delphi method,the index is added and revised and established.The first-round screen except the membership degree<0.3,and the mean value is less than 3,the second wheel screen except the variation coefficient >0.25 index and determine the importance of the index.Finally,carry out the verification work,the index system and the design of the government purchase index system of public sports service in the tender documents were compared and analyzed,to construct a reasonable choice of undertaking party provide practical experience based on the evaluation index system,the index system is summarized.