Not to be overlooked: How the United States Supreme Court shapes the administrative state

By analyzing the varying constitutional, institutional, political, and intellectual dynamics of substantially significant eras in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court, each successive chapter in this dissertation has advanced the theory that the Court's rulings create an American administrative state that is judicially-centered. Beginning in 1803 with the establishment of judicial review with the landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, this research examined ninety constitutionally and administratively significant Supreme Court cases on topics such as, but not limited to, federalism, separation of powers, equal protection under the law, and due process. In doing so, this research explores governmental principles of responsiveness, responsibility, and representativeness in light of administrative demands for efficiency, effectiveness, and economy. In the end, the contribution to the literature will ensure that students of public administration examine the third branch of government with greater scrutiny.