| In a context of unprecedented social and economic change, Ireland's established parties have demonstrated unusual flexibility and creativity in managing the consequences of these changes within the electoral arena. While the potential for a major reshuffling of the electoral landscape surely exists in this uncertain environment, the established political parties have maintained their overall electoral predominance through it all.;My work addresses both the supply and demand side of Irish politics. I establish how Ireland's transformed society has altered public opinion on salient issues ranging from the economy, nationalism, immigration, corruption, religion and the EU. I also examine how parties choose to translate, and ignore, these issues as they relate to party competition. My argument is that parties do not just reflect social divisions; they shape them, selecting some and side-stepping others. The electoral predominance of the established parties is not the result of mere sociological determinism, institutional or structural factors. Nor can their electoral per durance be explained principally by the additional resources available to the established parties as a result of the economic success of the Celtic Tiger. Rather, I argue that their ongoing success can best be understood by appreciating the evolving context in which Irish parties operate, and the specific institutional, ideological, and organizational strategies adopted by the parties in response to a turbulent environment.;This dissertation explores the ways in which Ireland's established parties have employed multiple strategies along several dimensions to preserve their longer-term electoral predominance. In this sense, Ireland represents a useful case for studying political parties as independent variables. These party strategies include the institutional displacement of potentially contentious issues, the absorption and avoidance of issues along the ideological dimension, and organizational adaptation at the national and local levels. These measures are often deployed simultaneously and in mutually reinforcing ways to undermine challenger parties. Somewhat paradoxically, centralization, professionalization, and other attendant modernizing political trends have reinforced the traditional character of Irish party politics. Rather than rationalizing patterns of party competition, these trends have deepened the clientelism, personalism, and local character of Irish politics. Case studies, including three divergent constituencies across two critical elections, 1973 and 2007, provide a detailed analysis of how party competition actually works as a result of these strategies. |
