| This dissertation examines administrative roles within the context of everyday public administration. Specifically, it studies the relationship between administrative roles assumed by public administrators and (1) the perceived presence of administrative discretion, (2) individual level beliefs regarding involvement in policy formulation and (3) tenure with organization.;This dissertation has a three-fold purpose. First, it delineates the types of roles assumed by public procurement specialists. Second, it tests whether administrative discretion, beliefs regarding participation in policy formulation and organizational tenure are significant in explaining the assumption of certain types of roles. Finally, the dissertation evaluates the implications for the public procurement process of the predominance of certain roles.;The theoretical logic for this dissertation draws on the theory of representative bureaucracy and role theory. These frameworks suggest that public administrators who have access to higher levels of administrative discretion would be more likely to assume a representative type role. Along similar lines, strong expectations regarding one's involvement in policy formulation would increase the probability of the enactment by public administrators of a representative type role. Finally, it is expected that organizational tenure, through organizational socialization, would decrease the probability of a public administrator assuming a representative type role.;It is found that administrative discretion, individual expectations and organizational tenure are indeed important predictors of the assumption of administrative roles. Administrators who believe that they have access to relatively high levels of discretion and those who believe they should be involved in policy formulation are more likely to assume a representative type role. On the other hand, with increased tenure public administrators are less likely to assume a representative type role. |
