| The purpose of this study was to analyze the human resource allocation of one urban school district located in Southern California in comparison to the recommendations of the Evidence-Based Model. Prior to collecting data from the district, the researcher identified four strategies for increasing student achievement. These strategies were utilized as a benchmark when analyzing the strategies used by the district. A mixed-methods approach was used in this study. Qualitative data in the form of anecdotal notes was used to comprehend the district's decision-making when implementing specific strategies and practices. Quantitative data on position counts was input into a simulation database model developed by Picus and Knight (2012) to identify gaps among the district's desired allocation, its current human resource allocation, and that recommended by the Evidence-Based Model.;Overall, the study provides the district with responses and findings to the following research questions: 1) What research based human resource allocation strategies improve student achievement? 2) How are human resources allocated across the district of study and its schools? 3) Is there a gap between current human resource allocation practices and what the research suggests is most effective? 4) How can human resources be strategically re-allocated to align with strategies that improve student achievement?;Findings of this study serve as a tool for the district of study, educational leaders, and policy makers. The study takes into account California's fiscal situation at the time of this study in addition to the difficulties of meeting state and federal demands with limited funds. The district's human resource allocation is displayed, demonstrating its effective use of resources in some areas and its lack of personnel in others. This study provides the district with recommendations regarding human resource allocation trade-offs that meet its current funding budget and benefit student achievement. Results of the study demonstrate that, although recommendations are applicable, they are not significant in closing the gap between the district's current human resource allocation and the Evidence-Based Model. Therefore, this study may be used as a sample for policy makers to examine the great efforts of one district and the barriers imposed due to lack of adequate funding. |
