Research On The Reform Of Scientific Activities In The Network Era

The changes happening in the status quo of scientific activity include the new emerging communication tools and interactive platforms,a more open environment and even a new paradigm shift impacting the entire scientific process.Science 2.0 allows individuals not only to collaborate with each other online but also to share ideas,methods,data and findings besides their published papers.At the same time,the transition from print media to instant messaging contributes to the timeliness and universality of scientific communications,the traditional mechanism of scientific operation has also gradually faced new challenges,including new changes in the process of scientific activities,new trends in the release of scientific results,new problems in the dissemination of scientific results,and new challenges to the mechanism of scientific evaluation.Entering the Internet age,scientific research subjects have moved toward a diversified online research model.On the one hand,the Internet era has created a new model of collaborative research and development based on big data.The online reconstruction of large and small sciences enables extensive integration of knowledge and information.The co-construction and sharing platform built by the network not only realizes the sharing of resources and platforms for large science projects,but also systematically integrates and aggregates the scattered small scientific experimental devices and data.In addition,the emergence of specialized digital collections and cloud storage not only helps to solve new problems in massive data storage,but the development of cloud computing management technology and deep learning related software also provides a new path for online parallel analysis and intelligent processing of big data.The transformation of scientific research model makes online collaboration become the norm,which is conducive to the discovery and mining of new knowledge and rules in massive data,to the transformation of scientific research from part to whole,and at the same time,to the strengthening of the intersection and integration of disciplines.On the other hand,the Internet era leads human scientific activities to a new era of instant communication and comprehensive collaboration.Diversified interactive platforms will promote extensive and intensive cooperation in science.In particular,online platforms make it possible for many scholars to interact in real time,which means that scientists can work together to maximize their potential and thus promote scientific progress more efficiently.At the same time,the crowdsourcing model of online scientific research will maximize the enthusiasm of the public to fully participate in scientific research and innovation.In a word,the network realizes the interrelation between people and people,people and information,people and instruments,which makes scientific activities move towards full openness and cooperation.In the network era,the diversity of scientific achievement publishing platform and the richness of publishing content gradually promote academic publishing to be open,high-quality and efficient.The way of publishing achievements based on network ontology will become the core of scientific communication in the future.First of all,online pre-release platforms have gradually become new regulations in some disciplines,which not only qualitatively improve the timeliness of the publication of papers,but also solve many technical problems of preprints in the paper media era,and challenge the traditional confirmation mechanism of the right to publish.First of all,the network pre-release platforn has gradually become a new rule in some disciplines,which not only qualitatively improves the timeliness of paper publication,but also solves many technical problems of preprint in the paper era,and challenges the traditional priority confirmation mechanism.Secondly,open access journals have broken the monopoly of traditional science and technology journals,and will promote the reform and reshaping of the publishing system in terms of practice models and operating mechanisms.The prevalence of social networking platforms and the disruption of pirated websites have disrupted existing publishing rules and patterns,forcing publishers to actively adapt to the new situation of open access.All of these will promote the realization of the free,open and shared vision of all academic achievements,thereby further breaking through the barriers of the traditional communication system.Finally,the promotion of network technology would lead to the function of online reconfiguration of scientific communication system,network ontology to release the new model not only means that scientific research online to present all the way,everyone can be issued anytime and anywhere,at the same time,also always can get comments and feedback,as well as precise and rapid filtration mechanism and personalized recommendation service.Web-based publication models and communication methods are still being explored,but we have encountered problems such as path deviation of open access,difficulty in determining priority,and frequent failure of review mechanisms.First,in the process of practicing the concept of knowledge sharing,open access pays more attention to reading free literature,which leads to difficulties in system design,service path and operation mode.therefore,it is necessary to re-examine the functions and values of the scientific publishing system,including authoritative screening mechanism,continuous authentication process,and providing personalized search engine services to readers.Firstly,the priority determined by research achievements will be toward the attention on the whole research process.With the research subject and the fully open scientific process changing,the priority faces the new attribution determination problem and we need to reconsider the criteria for the classification criteria and determination rules.Secondly,confirmation mechanism of priority is also in change.Due to the transfer of the ways to release scientific research achievements from paper-based media to online network,the traditional confirmation mechanism needs to be updated.Third,the free release of scientific information and the full online process of scientific research will inevitably lead to a comprehensive crisis of the existing filtering mechanism.On the one hand,the peer review mechanism is still used as the main means of judging the value of online scientific research results,but we should make full use of the immediacy and effectiveness of the network to transform and upgrade it.On the other hand,the diversity of scientific information presentation has gone beyond the scope of traditional filters.The premise of realizing the aggregation and filtering of information flow is the construction of an ecosystem oriented to the whole scientific research process,on this basis,combined with alternative index system and qualitative comments,so as to provide personalized search engine services,so that scientific information can be used efficiently.The advent of the Internet era has fully introduced scientific activities into a new era of open cooperation,instant communication and evaluation.However,the scientific evaluation system and reward mechanism based on the traditional publishing system make it difficult for science to break through the historical inertia of media conversion.The traditional academic evaluation system is still limited to the appraisal of the results of the papers.Moreover,it is hindering the development of science towards a more open and diversified communication culture with a distorted ecological value orientation of scientific research.Therefore,it is imperative to build an evaluation system to adapt to the network environment.Alternative metrology aims at the development and application of multiple scientific metrics,which not only evaluate a diverse range of objects but also identify and measure new forms of academic achievement,and the scope of influence has also been expanded to comprehensively measuring academic influence,in addition to measure the potential to affect the entire society.However,as a key factor in promoting open science,the development at this stage is still focused on the structure of paper-level influence,and it has not really started the establishment of evaluation indicators for the transition to open science.It needs to be supplemented by the macro vision and framework of open science.With the development and maturity of alternative indicators,it is bound to change the incentive structure and correct the imbalanced incentive mechanism.By comprehensively considering the output of researchers,we will move towards a more useful and flexible academic communication system,which is also the basis for a more open and collaborative scientific activity in the future.