Kuhn's Paradigm And Scientific Views Of SSK

Thomas Kuhn, as a renowned scientific philosopher, his paradigm theory had many influences in many domains, such as, to the history study, the history study, the sociology, the psychology , and so on .Especially to scientific view . The SSK, originating from paradigm theory and developing, further, become the vigorous growth dialogical trend of scientific philosophy. Because SSK profoundly criticizes traditional scientific view, the SSK theory gives rise to pay close attention to this field. Conducting the research to paradigm and SSK scientific view, will understand Kuhn theory deeply. At same time, the research is also beneficial for proving up the development tendency of scientific view.As the historical principle representative personage, Kuhn emphasized more historical, social, the psychological function than logical diagnosis principle and logical empiricist. Paradigms were depended on the multitudinous predecessor. Thus, my article elaborated the origin of Kuhn ideas in the first part.where I mainly mentions N.Hanson, M.Polanyi, and so on. Their related theory were absorbed in paradigm.Besides, the text has made a more detailed elaboration to paradigm of content and take paradigm as core view. Paradigm was proposed in"scientific revolution structure"and was used to describe science development, the scientific revolution, the scientific community formation. Moreover, paradigm is control thought in the whole scientific views. However, the important idea's definition is fuzzy. England's Masterman thinks there are 21 differentconcepts. Of course, some people have different views. For example, XiaJisong , chinese scholar, have 10 kind of understanding. Facing these disputes, in the text of Essential Tension, he has carried on two kind of classifications to paradigm, one kind is comprehensive, cluding all pledge in scientific community, another kind is to take the very important pledge as the preceding subset. I think no matter have how many definitions the paradigm has been given, its esscen is to introduction study understanding pattern from huamnitities, to conduct the science the origin with society cultural, to promulgated the science of cultural the essential characteristic, to repudiate science priviledged position.Feyerabend's scientific views have absorbed paradigm. Particularly, incommensurability, relativity, non-rational, characteristic. He had carried on the one-sided development in this foundation, overturned thoroughly tradition science. He argues with science standard is wrong and non-science, such as, the religion, the myth, and so on. His principles methodologies have positive promoted fusion between the science and the humanities, at same time, his views have promoted tradition scientific view charge. He likes a bridge to union paradigm and SSK.Part Three and Part Four are my article key parts. At the first, I introduced SSK forming process, the though origin as well as each school elementary theory viewpoints. Next, I plan to defend the SSK thought fountainhead, its character has challenged science objective, promoted the scientific philosophy research turn to epistemology and developed relativism .The theory which the model transformed , explained the science development machine-made question , expounded the science jumps-type development route, questioned the science rationality , opened the new epistemology sight, and provided the esiptemology presise. In particular, sociology analysis method has imspired the SSK methodology research.In brief, from the Edinburgh school's to the Berlin school's of thought, the SSK researchers move toward the micro-examination from the macro-examination, changes the practice research from the fundamental research. Beside on the total guiding principle theory, each of school come up with its own view, "The society constructs the construction to discuss the guiding principle", "the benefit analysis guiding principle", "the experience relativism guiding principle", "the laboratory research guiding principle", and so on. Thought their basic is different, but his view is dissimilarly. I will analyze in this part.In part Four, I mainly analyze the phenomenon of paradigm research turning to anthrology from sociology. Although the SSK researcher had the model thought relativity, the non- rationality advanced insufficiency. Importantly, it has more provided a new angle of view for the scientific philosophy research, set the science on the cultural stratification plane to research. Next, I will further launch the elaboration in the above foundation. Mainly includes to the scientific cultural research understanding, compassioned paradigm and CSS, analyzing the science practical philosophy how to absorb the paradigm, and Kuhn how to see the CSS. About CSS was influence cospect; the author mainly from the relativity, the freedom, the multiple three aspects perform to elaborate.The innovation of this article: by comparing Kuhn's paradigm with SSK view, using the method of case research and the form of the history study. I have analyzed how the padagim influenced each school of reveal different science view in different degree of SSK.