The Idea Of Paradigm

In different works of Kuhn,the descriptive definition of "paradigm" is often different,which leads to the majority of people who are asked to define "paradigm" think it is full of "ambiguity".Therefore,when the "paradigm" is defined,it tends to be ambiguous in meaning and selective in context.Furthermore,the scientific significance and positive contribution of "paradigm" in theory,method and value are also questioned constantly.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the semantic meaning of "paradigm" and standardize the context in which "paradigm" is used.From the perspective of speculation,it is meaningful to examine the "paradigm" in terms of ontology,methodology and axiology and discuss its rationality.First of all,the thesis from the perspectives of ontology research,combing the form the basic logic of "paradigm",reveals the connotation of "paradigm" before and after the consistency and integrity of the characteristics of mining the formation of "paradigm" has the property of the unity of history and logic,and "paradigm" was originated from Kuhn thinking mode transformation,conceived in "scientific community",ripe in the "dictionary";On the basis of clarifying the connotation and boundary of the "paradigm",it is found that the essence of the "paradigm" is the mode of knowledge production and the mode of existence on the whole.Secondly,from the perspective of methodology,the paper explores the theoretical background and method basis of the construction of "paradigm".In terms of theoretical construction,the "paradigm" draws on the useful and reasonable parts of the deductive principle of hypothesis,the principle of verifiability and the principle of falsification.In terms of research methods,discipline methods such as history,sociology and philosophy of science provide methodological guidance for the construction of "paradigm".Finally,from the perspective of value theory,the thesis combs the value paradigm and logical approach of "paradigm" historicalism and humanism,and reveals the value rationality of the "paradigm" era.The paper believes that Kuhn’s "paradigm" has surpassed the limitations of "universality"-"static"-"pure reason" from the three dimensions of scientific progress evaluation standards,models and logic,and realized the historical shift of Kuhn’s scientific concept;The "paradigm" transcends the limits of traditional scientism and realizes the turn of humanism because it guides the value belief of the scientific community,stipulates the behavior of the scientific community,and constructs the thinking system of the scientific community.From the perspective of holistic philosophy,ontology,methodology and axiology,the thesis reflects on the connotation essence,theoretical method basis,and era value orientation of "paradigm",and clarifies the rationality of the era of "paradigm".The study believes that the development of Kuhn’s "paradigm" is consistent and consistent,and is the unification of history and logic;at the same time,the scientific philosophy and natural science theory of the Kuhn era provide sufficient theory for the formation of Kuhn’s "paradigm" Nourish and learn from methods.The rationality of Kuhn’s "paradigm" is represented by the unity of instrumental rationality and value rationality.Therefore,the reason for the "paradigm" ambiguity lies in: the intentional choice of the "paradigm" user and the theoretical extension of the "paradigm" domain itself;the development of Kuhn’s "paradigm" conforms to the law of the development of general scientific theories and is open;"paradigm" The use and development as a whole are manifested in the unity of purpose and regularity.