The Question Concerning Technology In The Technological Era

The long inhibition of theory about the technique overthrow finally because of the influence of the Technique, the technique become the one of the centre questions of the Philosophy reflection. However, Kinds of warns about the technique are buried in faster technique programs quickly, Reflection of the technique become seriously difficult and the talk about the technique still be decided by horizon which be opened by technique itself.The simplify of the world view make the thinking of technique can't escape from the spell of itself, and the Object-oriented mode of thinking fails to reveal the nature of technology. The essence of modern technology more ambiguous than the nature of science, so as to that we can't extent the state of asking the modern technology. Because the technology hasn't made us to be saved, and the definition which about the technique of tools-theory and Anthropology can't rehouse the technique truthfully either, the technology which be the end and the completed state of metaphysics is actually accelerating "custom" in its process. When welfare enhancing substances closely related to scientific and technological progress, People will come up to make irrelevant comments about technology in the level of the tool-theory, and symbolically rely on the technical factors to find a breakthrough in the theory of human-centrism exports. The asking of the technical nature still often be interrupted by anthropological significance of the "correct opinions" usually, The opinion of treating technique as the science is materialized singly and thinking the technique is the standpoint thing still popular, This shows that the technology still in states of considering to the people who wallowed in technical interests. Therefore, the reflection of technology in the era of technology, whose possibility should outrun the technique factors.Heidegger's Asking of the technical's nature in more than half a century ago is still the call, whose "Technology thinking" maintained the purity of thought. It not only provides the useful reference for any continued exploring about the nature of technology, but also shows that the technical ponder may be prevented from the duress of the technical factors.