Research On The Contemporary Humanization Furniture Design Of China And Finland

Furniture is an indispensable media and tool of human life in social practice and activities, which contains dual attributes of material and spiritual. As is the staggered and regional carrier of culture, furniture is an important way of expression of human life, which embodying historical, cultural, scientific, aesthetic factors and many other.Humanization design of furniture pays attention to both the physical and psychological needs of individuals, emphasize the spiritual and emotional care.since this concept come to naissance ,it always emits a shine of humane spirit .In this people and products ,man and nature are perfectly syncretized.Modern Finland furniture wins the favor of the world with a high degree of humanity, with its perfect combination of modern processing technology,traditional handicraft techniques and natural materials, good environmental quality of the design, silent and warm life atmosphere.Meanwhile,it is regarded as a people-centered model of design.through this we know that great attention is paid to the public daily life and traditional values. In this century, Finland furniture has became one of the world treasure and meanwhile it begins to lead the worldwide design trend.Ming furniture ,the peak of Chinese furniture history, is famous for its pure combination of cultural, artistic and scientific features;In modern times,Chinese furniture heritage encouters obvious division; while China's modern furniture absorbs western industrial production technology ,it also fully accepts their product forms. Thus Chinese furniture gets a bad reputation of plagiarism and inexpensive imitation for a long time .Nowdays, China has become the world's top furniture Manufacturers. However, in the time of the production of human society gradually turning from a purely material consumption to the production valuing the spirit of the design, the problems in front of Chinese furniture is not "to manufacture what", but"to design what".This thesis makes an comparative analysis between china and Finland which both have a glorious furniture history.Thus this paper has a clear purpose as well as as strong and realistic significance.We mainly anylize from the aspects of the national tradition,cultural connotation, aesthetic standards, science and technology , to find the reasons for the gap between the two countries. The article believes that gap lies not in technic, but mainly in the original design such as standard,level and grade.Meanwhile,it lacks systemic consideration of Chinese specific human environment,emotional relationships between furniture and indi-viduals.Papers make the final conclusion, that our country The deep-seated reasons is the neglect of Chinese cultural heritage caused by subordination to Western art standards for the evaluation and the humanistic concern defect caused by imitating the style of external Herd.In the end we make the final conclusion and pointed out the references to our country's contemporary furniture design.