| Objective To investigate the influence on immune functions and theapeutic effects of combined immunosuppressive therapy in children with severe aplastic anemia.Methods All children with SAA were given tow kinds of CIS therapy,the groupâ… (7 cases) with HDIVIG,HDMP,CsA and ATG;the groupâ…¡(16 cases) with CsA,HDIVIG,HDMP.Flow cytometry was used to detect the counts of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD8~+,CD(16~+56)~+from peripheral bloods in the children with aplastic anemia and in 35 normal healthy children.Protein analysor was used to detect the contents of IgA,IgG,IgM and hemogram,bone marrow smear at the same time.Resultsâ‘ There was significant improvement of the count of myelogram,peripheral bloods WBC,Hb and PLT(P<0.01) for the SAA between before and after treatment.The groupâ… was much better the groupâ…¡,which the counts of peripheral bloods WBC,Hb and PLT and the effective ratio of groupâ… was better significant than the groupâ…¡(t'=2.20,t=2.33,t'=2.88,x~2=4.40,all of them P<0.05).â‘¡In the groupâ… ,before treatment,there were no significant differences of the counts of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD8~+,CD4~+/CD8~+ comparing with those of normal control group(t'=0.44, t'=1.11,t'=0.67,t=1.33,all of them P<0.05);but after treatment,those of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD4~+/CD8~+ were significant lower than those of normal group(t'=2.45, t'=3.22,t=2.20,all of them P<0.05);no was that of CD8~+.There were no significant differences of the counts of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD8~+,CD4~+/CD8~+ between the untreated and treated children with SAA in the groupâ… (t value was 1.1;0.32;0.81;0.16 respectively,all of them P>0.05).In the 11 cases children with SAA-â…¡in the groupâ…¡,before treatmend,there was no significant difference of the count of CD3~+ compare with those of normal control group(t'=0.51,P>0.05);but the counts of CD4 ~and CD4~+/CD8~+ were significant lower than those of normal group(t=5.33, t'=7.21,all of them P<0.01),the count of CD8~+ was significant higher than that of normal group(t=16.29,P<0.01).After treatment,in the 11 cases with SAA-â…¡in the groupâ…¡,there was no significant difference of the counts of CD3~+ compare with that of normal control group(t=1.75,P>0.05);but those of CD4~+,CD4~+/CD8~+ were significant lower than that of those of normal group and that of CD8~+ was higher significant than that of that of normal group(t=3.18,t'=4.05,t=11.50,all of them P<0.01).In the 11 cases children with SAA-â…¡in the groupâ…¡,there were no significant differences of the counts of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD8~+,CD4~+/CD8~+ between treated and untreated cases(t value was 1.86;0.45;1.83;1.95 respectively,all of them P>0.05).After treatment,the counts of CD3~+,CD4~+,CD8~+ of the children in the groupâ… was significant lower than those of the 11 cases of children in groupâ…¡(t value was 4.24;5.88;5.53 respectively all of them P<0.05),but there was no significant difference of the ratio of CD4~+/CD8~+(t=0.54,all of them P>0.05).â‘¢Before treatment,the count of NK of the children in the two groups were all higher significant than that of normal group(t=7.80,t=5.48,all of them P<0.01).After treatment,in the groupâ… ,there was no significant difference of the counts of NK of the children between in the groupâ… and in the normal group(t=0.65,P<0.05).However,the SAA-â…¡in the groupâ…¡,the counts of NK was higher significant than that of normal group(t=3.83,P<0.01).The counts of NK of the children in groupâ… after treatment was lower significant than before treatment(t=2.83,P<0.05),and there was no significant difference of that in the groupâ…¡between before treatment and after treatment(P<0.05).After treatment,The counts of NK of the children in groupâ… was lower significant than that in the groupâ…¡(t=2.12,P<0.05).â‘£Before treatment,There was no significant difference of the counts of CD19~+ between treated and untreated children with SAA in the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the counts of CD19~+ in the groupâ… was higher significant than that of normal group(t=3.69,P<0.05),and there was no significant difference of that in the groupâ…¡(t=0.66,P>0.05).⑤There were no significant difference of the content of IgA,IgG,IgM between the treated and untreated children with SAA and normal group(P>0.05).Conclusionsâ‘ The abnormality of immunologic functions,especially the cells immunologic functions,plays an important role in the pathogenes is of AA.â‘¡The change of immunologic functions of SAA-â… is lower than that of SAA-â…¡,and the immunologic functions of SAA-â… recovers easilier than that of SAA-â…¡.â‘¢Combined immunosuppressive therapy is a very effective treatment in childhood with SAA,which ATG is more excellent.â‘£There is still the abnormality of the cells immunologic functions after treatment by CIS. |