On Roland Barthes's Literary Thoughts

Roland Barthes have multiple identities:"versatile" and "War Home", "symbol scholars", "structuralist," "literary historians", "The Myth of Jurists," "critics", "hedonic theorists", "writer" and "scribes" and so on.Bart is a "hybrid home ":he is involved in wide areas, from literature to semiotics, from movie theater to photography, from music to clothing.This article aims to explore the Bart Literature.Semiotics is a key to understand the thinking of Barth.Semiotics draws on Barthes Saussure, the sign thought of the Louis Hjelmslev and others to develop their own "story refers to the system, "and summed up, "implicitly means", "meta-language" Two representatives form. Barthes Semiotics end its purpose is to establish a telling sign language to learn, that element of semiotics. However, a greater interest in Bart not to complete this, but the use of semiotic methods to analyze various phenomena. Literature as a subtle means, the language of symbolism, the diversity of reading Bart's semiotics are consistent.Bart believes that as a subtle means of literary language, the language was a "Doxa" of soaked, within the meaning of the language and can refer to both suffered different degrees of expansion of the interpretation. Bart prudent sort of thinking that after the literary language, adjectives are false; on the use of terms should be careful; sentence meaning as a form of stability, therefore, which are often condensed "Doxa"; Barthes claimed that the traditional novel death, the reason is the traditional novel has an unreliable factors:the hypocrisy of the third person perspective and the simple past tense. Bart is not envisioned a "history" of the language, as the representative of modern poetry. Of course, this is a good desire, Bart knows it. Transparent, pure language is an illusion. Although Barthes explored from various angles of the language and the language the way out of crisis, but the language of literature can not help but become a "language of Utopia."Bart the "author" position from the altar drive down, and read out "of the death," the notice. "Death of as if "death of God" as shocking, but also be treated as post-modern "events" are repeatedly described. No parent works into existence. Bart The aim is to "readers" involved in making music, promoting the body participate in the reading, the pursuit of meaning "plural." Meanwhile, Bart intertextual reference Kristeva's theory that "text" is the "tissue", around a text, a text to find out the net. Text is the text of other "debris" woven. The only trace of the divine works, that is the product of originality, but also had disappeared. Bart leaves us with a way of "debris" and wait for those of us who love literature to pick up again, to restore a pure, holistic literature.