Research On Dyadic Emotion Regulation Strategies For College Students

The research objectives were to examine the factor structure of Dyadic emotion regulation strategies for college students, the order of the Dyadic emotion regulation strategies, its antecedents, such as demographic variable, the relationship of interpersonal relationship for college students and Dyadic emotion regulation strategies for college students.For the purpose, the data were collected by interviewing,relevant references'analysis, questionnaires.The conclusions drawn by this research were as follows:First, The questionnaire of this stuty have good reliability and validity. Dyadic emotion regulation strategies for College students is composed of nine factors: cooperate—cooperate strategy, cooperate—compete strategy, cooperate—avoid strategy, compete—cooperate strategy, compete—compete strategy,compete—avoid strategy, avoid—cooperate strategy, avoid—compete strategy and avoid—avoid strategy. Nine factors can explain total questionnaires'59.42%. And the modle of nine factor got a support by the result of confirmatory factor analysis.Second, In angry situations, the order of Dyadic emotion regulation for college students strategies are:cooperate—cooperate strategy, compete—cooperate strategy, avoid—cooperate strategy, avoid—compete strategy, avoid—avoid strategy, compete—avoid strategy, compete—Compete strategy, cooperate—compete strategy and cooperate—avoid strategy.Third, Dyadic emotion regulation strategies for College students have a significant differences in genders,majors,between only child and non-only child, Interactive people,but not in location and family income.Four, Dyadic emotion regulation strategies for College students and interpersonal relationship regression equations show that:there were five strategies: cooperate—cooperate strategy, avoid--cooperate strategy, avoid—avoid strategy, avoid—competition strategy and competition--competition strategy into the regression equation. Multiple correlation coefficient is 0.541, joint explain the variation for 29.3%, especially cooperate—cooperate strategy have the highest rate explanation is 16.4%, this shows that cooperate—cooperate strategy in Dyadic emotion regulation strategies have greatest influence on interpersonal relationship.