Looking: The Introjection With Respect To The Field Of Thinking Between Heidegger And Aristotle

This essay contains three chapters. The first concerns Heidegger's course of thought before forming Being and Time and the whole state in Germanic thought, especially focuses on the period, during which Heidegger handed in a thesis requested to the chair of philosophy in Marburg University. I argue, Heidegger had already gotten rid of Husserl's phenomenology at that time, and gradually formed his peculiar understanding, which came from unscrambling Aristotle's and Hellenic context, to phenomenology. Meanwhile, Germanic thought was flooded with two strong schools, I called them "the Mode of Kant" and "the Mode of Dilthey", which also influenced the interpretation to Aristotle's and Hellenic context. Heidegger is closer to the latter, because Dilthey's conceptions, such as "live-experience", "understanding", are the key to searching "factical life" and establishing a "hermeneutics", which are proposed in his interpretation to Aristotle.The second chapter, in which details Heidegger's thesis for the junior position in Marburg University: "Phenomenological Interpretations in Connection with Aristotle: A Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation", is principal part. In the course of analysis, I regard the question about "Looking" as the main line. It concerns all important conceptions coming from Hellenic context, which also consist in the basis of Being and Time. I refer to the involved context in Being and Time and Pathmarks as well. Therefore, I make them form an interactive structure in Heidegger's problems of thinking. The analysis to three elements of hermeneutics, "the Position of Looking", "the Direction of Looking", "the Scope of Looking", describes the relationship between Heidegger and Aristotle profoundly. We can say, Heidegger will neither form the special language attributed to thinking itself, nor attain the inquiry approach from "factical life" (Dasein) to "Sein", if without Aristotle's context about the way of "Looking".In third chapter, according to Aristotle's context, I firstly investigate the extent to which Heidegger's interpretation to Aristotle is coincident with the provision of Hellenic thinking, therefore offer the support for his interpretation. It must endue the possibility of "be looked" with "looking", because only in the former, it will become clearer that what Heidegger surpasses Aristotle and metaphysics. Thus, I assert, Heidegger's interpretation to Aristotle opens the Hellenic language's power of speaking in the scale of pure thinking, he therefore becomes a pure thinker. I further delimit the domain of pure thinking, and concern the problem and history of philosophy as ramification of thinking itself.