Jizhu of the Analects by Zhuxi and Zhengyi of the Analects by Liubaonan are the highest achievements of the comments on the Analects which reached to in different Dynasties,Song Dynasties and Qing Dynasties,respectively.This article has made a general and precise comparison between the two books,and summarized the common grounds and the differents of them. This article divides into four chapters:The first chapter is prolusion. This part mainly introduced the historical of the important comments on the Analects.Besides,It aslo briefly analysed some knowledges about Jizhu of the Analects by Zhuxi and Zhengyi of the Analects by Liubaonan,such as the circulation process,the writing style and the research situation and so on.The second chapter is the comparison of the explanations views.The different Dynasties and the different academic environmens led to their different explanations views.For instance,the views of free explanations and rationalism by Zhuxi and the views of revered textual and character word criticism by Liubaonan.The three chapter is the comparison of the explanations methods.First is the different of the methodology.Second is the different of concrete methods.With the comparison we can see Liubaonan is more prefect and more mature than Zhuxi.Besidse,this part aslo analysed some different methods of the explanation by Zhuxi and by Liubaonan.Zhuxi always used the arc of visibility fusion and put the teach to the note.while Liubaonan always put the rationalism to the textual criticism,and makes the note by the historical evidence or the instance and so onThe four chaper is the comparison of the explanations contents .This part mainly used the explanations contents of Jizhu of the Analects by Zhuxi and Zhengyi of the Analects by Liubaonan to made a comparison between the body of Zhangju and the body of Zhengyi.Last,there is a conclusion.This part mainly summarized some evolution situations of the Chinese explanation study.For instance the development of the explanation method,the richness of the explanation content,and the Chinese philology return ,and so on. |