Exegetic Study Of Mengzi Zhengyi

Commentary on the works of Mencius by Jiaoxun in the Qing Dynasty is a commentary for Mengzi zhangju by Zhaoqi, which is a remarkable work. And it takes the essence from variety thoughts in the time. Basing on borrowing the previous researching results and methods, the modern linguistics theory is used in the course of researching. The study method is that synchronic analysis and diachronic study are combied. It is expected that the thesis would make a contribution to the study of Jiaoxun's exegesis, or even that of Qing dynasty'exegesis.The whole context is organized into 7 sections. The primary content is about:I .Commentary on the works of Mencius's exegetical content. A total sum up identify characters, explain terms, explain sentence, aggregate interest, mandarin and other fifteen content. Exegesis show the rich content and the extensive research.II. Commentary on the works of Mencius's exegetical methods. Jiao xun Fully inherit the traditional method exegesis and integrate "with the interpretation of the text" of the characteristics. Used yi xing suo yi, yin sheng qiu yi, gu xun mi yi, dui wen ming yi, yi wen zhi yi and exegesis of fourteen kinds of methods . Context is good and exegetical methods varied.III. Commentary on the works of Mencius's terminology. Briefed the sentence on the terminology , words to explain the terminology , descriptions of terminology, empty words and notes explaining the terminology Speech . To some extent that the use of terms not unified, not fixed, the problem is not clear.IV. Criticism and succeeded to Mengzi zhangju. Expositions from respected, and added that the amendment, suspected in several areas. Jiao xun and the Qing dynasty scholars not only respect the findings of previous research dare to boldly innovative academic integrity Evidently.V. Exegetical achievements and defects. Its main achievement has been benefited from different people from them all, Creation research "Mencius" collective work; Argument is sound and ease of clarity; Breakthrough "diversion not broken Note" into law-school realistically reflect the spirit of learning. Its main deficiency is Sean too complicated, contrary to some exegesis principles and some key mistakes.