The Way Of Zhuangzi's Speech And Wittgenstein's Speech And Theirs Comparison

The study of Western Philosophy experienced three great diversions: ontological diversion,epistemological diversion and philologic diversion. The third diversion was put forward by Ludwing Wittgenstein. He pointed definitely in his book that languang could express something that they could exprss.For those things that could not be expressed,we must keep silence. So his later language philosiphy turned to studying daily language.But two thousand years ago, a Chinese philosopher named Zhuangzi,also noticed this question ,and he also conquered predicament of language.For this question Chinses Philosophy was so similar to Western Philosophy.This paper starts with the contrast of their speaking quomodo, trying to analyse the deep-seated cause of their distinctness.IN this field that it could not be spoken,They all noticed it definitely, but how to speak out Something which could not be spoken. The solutions of this problem ware different. Wittgenstein deemed we should keep silence;but Zhuangzi thought there were two solutions to settle this problem:one was to keep silence,the other was to change speaking method.changed logical speaking to poetic speaking.I think the difference of the two philosophers is their difference thingking,it is also caused by their different cultural background and their different mental culture.I would discuss them in chapters and nodulus.This paper is divided into five parts:First,the problem is elicited in preface,it tells us the philosophy problem was reasonable. Sequentially,introduced their speaking characters respectively and at last analysed their difference from philosophy.