The Good Relationships Between The Development Of Network Literature And Network Literature Criticism And Network Literary Theory

Network literature is a new literary phenomenon arising under contemporary special epochal conditions, which has ever presented an entirely new world to people because of its network peculiarity. However, the problems existing in it have increasingly appeared in the course of developing and have greatly influenced its healthy development. In this article, the author probed into the interactive relationship between network literature and its literary criticism and its literary theory. On the one hand, it revealed the influence and enlightenment of literature development had on literary criticism and theory; on the other hand, it revealed the improper relationship existing between the three and its bad effects on the development of literary criticism. Thus, the article interpreted the trilateral interactive relations at the following three levels:Chapter One "The Problems of the Network Literature Development". In this chapter, first the author roughly combed the development course of network literature, and then pointed out the existing problems. He thought that network literature is a new type of literature, which was transformed from form to content, and that the network writer created network figures by the network language to reflect society life, which relied on network to disseminate, pertaining to read on the internet. It has several fundamental features such as the net-humanization of the body, the symbolization of the media and the multi-minimization of the text. As a new type of literature, however, network literature has many problems in the course of its development such as narrow meaning of subject matter and theme, the creating subject lacking self-consciousness and innovation consciousness and the improper relationship between network literature and traditional paperwork literature. The author thought the problems resulted mainly from the improper trilateral relationship.Chapter Two "the relationship between network literature and network literature criticism and network literary theory". This chapter mainly includes three parts: partone——the relationship between network literature and network literature criticism;part two——the relationship between network literature and network literary theory;part three——the relationship between network literature criticism and network literarytheory. In part one, first, the author combed the development sequence, and then based on this, the author interpreted the disconnection and estrangement between network literature and network literary theory. Part two came to the conclusion that there was improper and incompatible relationship between network literature and network literary theory by interpreting the estrangement between contemporary Chinese literary theory and contemporary literature practice. Part three indicated that the disconnection also existed between network literature criticism and network literary theory, which mainly expressed in three aspects such as network literature criticism could not directly guided by network literary theory timely, the outcome of network literature criticism could not climb the height of literary theory and the valuable and creative outcomes of network literature criticism, which could become network literary theory by being abstracted, induced and summarized, were very lack.Chapter Three "the countermeasures of establishing good relationships between the development of network literature and network literature criticism and network literary theory" First, the author pointed out that the development of network literature could not have a favorable wind all the way because it was controlled and affected by various factors. Then, the author put forward some countermeasures on establishing good relationships between network literature, network literature criticism and network literary theory, such as enhancing network literature cognition level and aesthetic level of the masses, especially the network literature readers, the critics and the theorists.