The Legal Attribute Of The Virtual Property In The Internet Game

With the rapid development of Internet in China, the network spread out across all levels of living in the virtual world and virtual world and the real internal social contradictions and conflicts present them with virtual property-related legal problems continue to appear, the impact was the most widely is the online game virtual property stolen by others, embezzlement and other cases appear. However, due to China for a "virtual property" lack of legislation in this regard, the judiciary in cases that often seem to give enough flawless. Forced, the Court's current tendency is to be characterized as such an act against property, for such a conclusion I believe that online games are not actually clarify the law of virtual property, real property, and the court found a lack of legal basis for force . Strong in the coming age of the Internet environment, the virtual-level legislation is imminent. Purpose of this paper is to compare the current through the existing academic theories, that nothing that the said property, intellectual property, said claims that the four theories, the online game virtual property laws to make more reasonable qualitative properties, and Finally, a number of legislative proposals. This is roughly the argument structure, the first in the introductory part started from a real case, the network raises the issue of virtual property sophisticated games, followed by games on the network theoretical definition of virtual property, which summarized the definition of online games and virtual property main features; then the game on the network theory of virtual property verify compliance with property rights come to the conclusion category; again and then through a comparative analysis of today's theorists of the more popular of the four theories, that nothing that the said property, claims that knowledge Property that is more reasonable to come to the right of property of its conclusions; fourth part the author for his views - claims that part of the property claims raised in the meeting under the premise of how empathy when faced with claims against the third person encountered to the problem; Finally, we compared model national legislation, proposed the law of China is missing a little bit of vision.