The Study On The Rural Governance Mode Based On The Contemporary China Villager Self-rule

Since 1980s,the rural governance mode of china established and changed on the basis of practicing villager self-rule. The thesis divides firstly the contemporary china villager self-rule into the early days and later period. Compared with the early days, the later period is in the course of systemization after late 1990s. On the basis of village self-rule , the mode of town regime—villager self-rule appeared. The basic regime was established in the town, villager self-rule was practiced in villages. But the thesis think it has appeared that the course of integration and conflict between town-regime and villager self-rule, so the villager self-rule lost its value of self-rule, faded into the government of town-regime. Its essence is self-rule by government or party.Some theorists affirmed and supported the town-regime and the villager self-rule generally, summarized and thought over the contemporary rural governance practice and question, brought out many rural governance modes, whose goal was to perform ideal villager self-rule, achieve the goal of four democracies and three selves. On the contrary, others criticized the theory and experience of Chinese villager self-rule, even denied the town-regime, brought out the critical villager self-rule.But the thesis think, on one hand, these modes make easily the villagers damaged by the systematical progress from upside to downside, and on the other hand, they are in contradiction to the unaverage society and history backgrounds of china. It is not useful to resolve the china rural governance questions with sole mode.The thesis takes firstly the cost—profit, power-right, tradition—modernism as the longitudes, and takes the safe space, social independence, history backgrounds as the latitudes,build preliminarily a interaction net, three-longitudes-three-latitudes model, who will affect the rural governance process.The thesis gets a conclusion through this model, that self-rule should be autonomous and independent. As for self-rule itself, it is impossible that we use only a sole mode. As for the whole rural governance, it is impossible too, that we use some kind of specific and sole mode, for example, town regime-villager self-rule, county regime-town substation—villager self-rule, town self-rule—village regime—team occupation, countryside and town self-rule, etc.Through the integrated observation on the china rural governance question, the thesis suggest, because the country power is over powerful, the control is too much and the systematization process is dominated by the state in the course of our ruralgovernance, according to the idea that we will make self-rule principle on the basis of dual democratization process, we should respect, maintain, arouse, enlarge villager's autonomous and independent rights and abilities to move and create, let people express themselves and move autonomously, promote the democratization process from downside to upside. We should get a balance between this process with the one from upside to downside. So, we probably find a multiple rural governance effect.The creation of the thesis is that it abandons the tactical pure tradition on the study of the rural governance modes, devotes itself to strengthen the relative theory basis, and makes the people who pay attention to the rural governance understand more comprehensively the rural governance question. On the way of study , the thesis integrates positive analysis and normative analysis, tries analyzing and synthesizing the rural governance mode from the multiple courses of economics, politics, sociology and psychology.