| Japan and our country belong to the same centralization of one system nation. In Recent 130 years, Japan established many laws to push self-government progress and to make administrative district divide legal and regular according to the national state. The method of Administrative district divide which is according to the way of mountain and stream matched the fast development of Japanese economy and society, and kept Japan long-term stability. Comparing with it, there are many shortcomings in Chinese administrative district divide, such as many layers, small range, too big first class, confused city system, sound legal system and imperfect moderate mechanism. The phenomenon of "there is counter plan where there is policy" can not be forbidden. Central with Local, centralization with power divide, freedom with order can not get nicely processing.According to the likeness of political and cultural characteristic, language and word belief in economy development, the writer think they will promote the reform of administrative district divide in our country, strengthen the government, exert the active and aggressive functions of Local place by means of comparison research on administrative district divide in China and Japan and drawing lessons from Japanese. The article analyses the characters of administrative district divide in Japan, describes the administrative district divide and local self-government feature in Japan, and finds several piece of apocalypse through the comparison research. The author hopes to infuse new vitality for the reform of administrative district divide in China.The article uses comparison, evidence and analysis research methods. Part one introduces concept, characters, structure of administrative district divide, objectively analyses the function of administrative district divide in administrative management. Part two describes the changes of administrative district divide in Japan and the present conditions of various common public group in local place especially Tokyo. The author analyses the local self-government and the power divide reform on the base of administrative district divide in Japan. Part three compares the administrative district divide between China and Japan from structure, the first class demarcation, city system and legal system which is based on the simply introduction to administrative district divide in China. The author discusses how we should improve the administrative district divide in China through learning from Japanese experience. The concrete contents includes: to perfect the current administrative district divide through strengthening legal system; to sort the management system of administrative district divide through improving the position and the class of administrative management and then to make a long-time adjusting. The author thinks strengthening the research of administrative district divide is necessary to nations. Following the reform of economy system, the exaltation of productive level and the improvement of transportation condition, the disadvantageous impact factors in our administrative district divide are more and more obvious to the development of our economic society. The request of reform is more and more urgent. On the other hand, administrative district divide is a very important job. At present, we should further strengthen the comparison research of administrative district divide. We should open widely our reform thought by means of learning mature ways from the other counties. |