Compare Pattern Of Being In The Power Of People's Action Party Of Singapore And Communist Party Of China

Nowadays the world is changing broadly and deeply, China is changing the same. Both the opportunity and the challenge are hitherto unknown. Communist Party of China is confronted with the heavy responsibility about how to lead the people seizing and using the important strategic opportunities and how to lead Chinese People to build the great target of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Suggest that 17th National Congress of the CPC report continues readjusting oneself to a certain extent with improving the Party's governing capacity in very important location after "reforming and perfecting Party's Pattern of being in the power" since 16th National Congress of the CPC in the report. How to adapt original pattern of leadership to new challenges and realize the Party's pattern of being in the power becomes one urgent problem.In fact The People's Action Party dominant the development of Singapore, has created "the Singapore's Miracle", the more important is that Singapore has realized the optimum agreement between democracy and authority, liberty and order, controlling and opening, centralization and decentralization, stability and the vigor. The Communist Party of China and the People's action Party of Singapore have similarity in many aspects: Both Parties are one Party's long-term governances; society, cultures are similar; both are in the East Asia area that economy increases flourishingly and keeping higher development speed. So cleaning up the elements and their interrelation of the modernized course in Singapore is very important especially the element of the party in power. The thesis depends on the comparison of the patterns of being in the power between the Communist Party of China and the People's Action Party of Singapore, one aspect seeks the reference value to improving and perfecting the pattern of being in the power of the Communist Party of China, on the other hand also hopes to have a contribution somewhat to the theory of party politics. The article style adopts historical comparison method, transverses direction comparison method and document method from four parts. The first chapter has cleaned up the basic concept of the party and the pattern of being in the power, has analyzed the position of the party in power in state's political life. The second chapter has recollected the course of the Communist Party of China and the People's Action Party of Singapore from coming into being to being in power. The purpose of investigation and discussion with a view that different way affects the country regime and governance style. The third chapter has compared Party's pattern of being in the power. Have mainly: Party system and operation way: China is China's CPC-led multi-party cooperation system; Singapore is People's Action Party one-party dominance. Two Parties' ideological forms changes: have experienced political Nationalism, economical Nationalism and are changing to democratic and free value; the social control method are high institutionalized; the relationship with legislation system, administrative system, and judiciary system. The purpose is to peel off the developing rules. Common points of the two partied have four aspects mainly: reduce the ideology and strengthen the economy; the adaptability of the political system and the party system's is highly; economic is prior to the democracy; two capitals has pushed forward democratization within authoritarianism system. The difference lain in developing speed and developing degree. Partâ…£has brought forward the thinking on several directions to the improvement of the pattern of being in the power of the Communist Party of China by comparing.