Font Size: a A A

The Comparative Study Of Offensive Defense Between China's Men Basketball Team And Top 4th Team In Thenearly Three Olympic Games

Posted on:2011-04-27Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J L LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2167360305461597Subject:Physical Education and Training
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Offensive and defensive aspects of the contradiction between two basketball promoted the development of the twentieth century, the nineties'offensive and defensive balance'into the twenty-first century,'offensive and defensive balance'had been satisfied with the modern basketball development. Teams have begun to attach importance to the world's defense, through the defense to suppress the other's attack, men's basketball world championships, Olympic Games and other international competitions, more and more frequent use of offensive defense, the world recognized the aggressive defense teams has become a golden key to victory. Chinese Men's Basketball Team in the World Series in several mediocre records is difficult to break, then that constraint on China's men's basketball team to further development? In this paper, literature review, expert interviews, video analysis, system analysis method, comparative analysis and logical analysis of the modern basketball offensive defense research, and through the past three Olympic Games, the Chinese team and the semi-finals of the offensive Defensive horizontal analysis and the Chinese team offensive defense longitudinal analysis, concluded that the Chinese men's basketball offensive defensive problems. The results are as follows:1, Against has the ball at the nearly three Olympic Games to discover that the Chinese men's basketball team against shooting disturbance rate with four strong does not have the significance difference. In against has the ball against to dribble presses hard on and disturbs, against passes a ball the disturbance rate and the stealing number of times, against breakthrough blocks off and violates a regulation the aspect to have the significance difference with four strong teams.2, In the nearly three Olympic Games against do not have in the ball to discover that the Chinese team in against catches a ball the disturbance without the ball rate and makes up cooperates against number of times with four to have the significance difference. The Chinese team against catches a ball the disturbance without the ball rate to be low, catches a ball the disturbance without the defense rate to be high, against moves gets rid meets the spherical aberration. Four strong take against non-ball member to catch a ball the attack; near body resistance prevents it to catch a ball in the attack area, to against the disturbance which catches a ball without the ball high and destructive.3, Snatches the interruption technology application in the nearly three Olympic Games to be frequent, snatches hits the stealing number of times to be many. The Chinese team snatches in the interruption nodule number and the success ratio with four has the significance difference. The defensive backboard's participation population and competed for the coordination to strengthen, took seriously to defend the backboard the protection and snatches attains, the Chinese team with four strong snatched in the defensive backboard attains does not have the significance difference.4, Nearly three Olympic Games Chinese team in against shooting strong jamming rate, against dribbles the advancement disturbance rate, to cooperate against to make up against the number of times, to block off the number of times, against to pass a ball the disturbance number and snatches aspects and so on stealing number of times by a session of enhancement, but in against dribbling converging attack number of times, against match breakthrough number of times, the defensive backboard snatches aspects and so on attaining rate actually to chase a session of drop.
Keywords/Search Tags:Olympic Games, aggressive defense, semi-finals, Chinese team
PDF Full Text Request
Related items