A Study On The Fine Penalty Of The Contemporary Miao Village

In China, the pacts can be described as historic. Currently, the survival status ofpacts, in the economically backward rural society still shine, on the contrary, it isincreasingly recognized. In those few backward minorities in remote areas, pactsfunction is still evident, and its authority is still to get the majority of the villagersrecognized. In academia, because the penalties pacts also caused no small controversy,then discusses the legal aspects of it is very necessary that some practical value pactsexist or worthy of recognition, it is necessary for the village bylaws people about theexistence of a space reserved, but obviously conflict with state law, the provisions ofthe fundamental rights of citizens damage that must be corrected.This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is a basic concept of sub-sector,mainly clear and fine paper pacts meaning of these two words. The second part iscollected on the basis of regional pacts on Minorities in on pacts in fines for a detaileddescription of the problem, including the three types of fine penalties, fines and otherpenalties implemented aspects. The third section is a discussion of the legal legitimacyof pacts, democracy, self-government itself should contain a mandatory factor pacts asa typical representative of the villagers’ autonomy should exist mandatory, while pactsin ethnic minority areas also played a significant ethnic heritage role of customary law,and therefore, pacts setting fines legitimacy and necessity of the existence of reality tosome extent. The fourth part is fine coordination pacts with state law, despite theexistence certainly worth pacts, but the fines set in real life there is a fine set free,"heavy penalties doctrine","issue there are multiple punishment" phenomena such asthe need for further implementation of legal advocacy, improve the developmentprocess, strengthen government supervision and guidance.