| Level of scientific research on behalf of the country's comprehensive strength, affects the country's political, economic, military, cultural, educational, medical and other undertakings. Science and technology research projects, affecting the development speed of national research and the country's comprehensive national strength, are the lifeblood of the country's economic lifeline and the level of effective protection of people's livelihood.Technology project review is to make effective use of national scientific research fund of scientific protection, so technology project review must use the most scientific and rational way. Assessment experts as the main body of science and technology project review is a critical factor that whether the National Natural Science Foundation funded correctly. With the peer review assessment methods in science and technology projects in the wide application, more and more scholars have found that evaluation experts affect the results of peer review. In order to standardize the assessment projects, it is need to improve the management of technology project evaluation experts.On the basis of Technology project management theory, System theory, Evaluation theory and Asymmetric information theory. Through project evaluation by an expert in technology management situation analysis, with management experts in the assessment process, there are several major problems: The first assessment of expert information "distortion" phenomenon. Projects of their own characteristics are to be innovative, but innovative take on the need to master the latest technological innovations from the information experts to carry out. Management experts currently in the process of assessment, as assessment expert update slowly, assessment content is too small, unscientific methods of information acquisition and other reasons, so difficult to accurately assess the body to grasp all aspects of expert information, and thus affect the assessment of the scientific. Assessment of experts in information management mechanism "distortion" phenomenon is mainly reflected on the assessment of experts and lack of timely information updates are not long-term follow documented . Second, it is lack of objective evaluation experts classify subjects, dynamic and scientific method. Experts in each field of study will be assessed as the development of the field change, and even some of the assessments of experts in various areas of research. When experts and scholars in the evaluation after the fund management institutions no longer assess the expert's study area to change, experts assessed after due to changes in research areas of this research area because information is obsolete not keep up with development and progress of time, and it is this ownership of the problem and assessment experts, seriously affect the project's scientific evaluation. Third, it is the problem of asymmetric information. Fund management institutions to assess the knowledge of experts, are adopted by the objective information that is not able to thoroughly understand that an assessment of the inner world of experts, it is difficult to know whether the assessment expert assessment of pure motives, whether the findings presented objective interference from external factors. The existence of the asymmetric information makes the fund management institutions are not able to correctly assess the expert evaluation of assessment results, and therefore some assessment experts evaluate the results against a certain ambiguity. Fourth, it is the assessment conclusion injustice .Assessment of experts in the project assessment, vulnerable to external disturbances, given the findings may be a violation of moral evaluation. So the problem of unfair assessment can not be achieved so scientific, objective and reasonable.Through the above analysis of the problem, identify the causes of these problems exist not only subjective and objective system of human factors, there are moral factors. In order to solve the problem of the cause should develop problem-solving methods. Management needs to improve the assessment of experts in three areas:The first is to establish a systematic assessment of expert dynamic management system. The management system design, both of entry and exit mechanisms for evaluation experts, evaluation mechanisms, and the establishment of norms and incentives used to assess the incentive and restrictive mechanism of experts. The design of the three management mechanism is based on the assessment of experts into a track out of the idea management process. Complete evaluation by an expert management system is designed to achieve comprehensive management of assessment experts. Followed, is the indicators chosen to build dynamic models. Expert in this article for assessing the dynamic model of entry and exit mechanisms for the construction, selection of experts to assess the academic research literature published in the number of indicators and by the dynamic nature of these two indicators to determine the assessment of experts to enter and exit qualifications. Experts assessed the dynamic evaluation system model, by horizontal divergence and vertical divergence to achieve the results of expert evaluation of the assessment of the amendment. In the dynamic incentive and restraint mechanisms model, we comprehensive analysis the basis index of evaluation experts for the model's significance.Finally, establish the dynamic models. First, subjects classified on the assessment of experts analyzes the problems, assess the experts found that the existing classification of subjects is not clear, so in the evaluation of projects, as assessment experts not know much about this area, so the findings presented do not have the scientific . This article for this issue, an expert on the assessment of the fuzzy dynamic cluster analysis, experts will assess the characteristics of subjects according to the assessment of experts on the subject classification, to achieve the assessment of the project evaluation experts and their areas of research in the field is consistent to meet and a more scientific evaluation. Second document on the assessment of experts to analyze the problem of aging, such current published literature on the assessment of expert statistical methods of data can not really explain the meaning of evaluation experts in the field of academic standards, and is currently used assessment of specialist literature and the method of direct statistical assessment just to participate in the project assessment expert for the uneven distribution of certain tasks and comprehensive evaluation of the problem is not accurate. Therefore, experts for the assessment of the statistics published literature, this paper documents the assessment of experts, the aging rate of the available literature the actual value of the statistical and management science literature the number of evaluation experts; third is the work of experts in assessing the performance of the anti-assessment. This used to assess the current performance indicators give an expert assessment of results against some limitations with this layer of the same assessment results were not scientific and objective. In this paper, the fuzzy Bayesian dynamic correction model to correct the assessment of the anti-assessment experts, allows assessment of specialist anti-assessment of change in a certain range, dynamic assessment of the performance assessment experts to judge the merits.This article contains the following six sections: the first part of writing this paper the background, meaning the management of peer review assessment of current development experts, this line of research content and technology; second part is the theoretical basis for this need; third part of the project evaluation is to find technology experts Dynamic Management of the problems and to identify the cause; fourth part is to design the management system assessment experts, including the establishment of several management mechanisms that are set up all the content management system and the need; The fifth part is through the establishment of indicator system and assessment model to achieve the dynamic management specialists; the sixth is to validate the model through case feasibility; seventh part is the full text of a general summary and outlook. |
PDF Full Text Request