U.s. To Chinese Anti-dumping Irrational Discussion

China's accession to WTO, has been a serious impact on anti-dumping, in this being, especially in the United States on China's most prominent anti-dumping measures. At the same time, the author found that in reading the literature related to scholars of China's anti-dumping studies, more from a national point of view to put forward some of the more general policy recommendations, and less consideration to the relevant anti-dumping cases initiated by the country, making The lack of some specific policy proposals, weakening the effectiveness of its implementation; In addition, relevant scholars at home and abroad against the voice of anti-dumping measures is also high.In view of this paper is based on the U.S. anti-dumping of the realities of the current China frequently the cause of anti-dumping analysis, combined with domestic and foreign scholars on issues related to the main points of the irrational nature of anti-dumping issue of the corresponding research. In this paper, comparative analysis to study the U.S. anti-dumping, one of the important reasons - the Sino-US trade structure between the two countries are different; the use of the basic principles of economics, welfare economics, game theory methods, comprehensive verification of the U.S. anti-dumping unreasonable nature of the general theoretical basis.This the one hand, from our point of view to consider the issue, pointing out that the United States in the dumping margin calculation methods the United States towards China's "double reverse" measures, "non-market economy" issue, "China's dumping," a misnomer in such areas as China is not reasonable; the other hand, from the U.S. point of view --- the U.S. anti-dumping on the negative impact of the United States itself to consider the issue, using the chart analysis demonstrated the U.S. anti-dumping impact on the welfare of the importing country, using the United States to China Wooden bedroom furniture anti-dumping case and the relevant data through case studies and empirical analysis concludes that the U.S. anti-dumping trade diversion resulting from making its anti-dumping measures are not successful in protecting the U.S. domestic producers, it can be conclude that the U.S. anti-dumping are both "damaged people" and "damage has been."And thus the position of standing between the two countries put forward corresponding countermeasures recommended that, at this stage the United States in response to the economic crisis and employment pressures, the best option is to free trade under the industrial adjustment, rather than under the protection of anti-dumping trade barriers to trade; strengthens Our country Government should with The US government dialog and negotiations ability and Our country Enterprise ability which solicits support in the US; a joint United States-related interest groups to oppose the U.S. anti-dumping; it is also necessary to change China's huge trade surplus with the U.S. situation, in order to alleviate the extreme dissatisfaction with the United States on this.