As the development of a larger sized, more centralized, and more antagonistic economic society, the game will be more and more widely used as a fresh decision-making management tool. This article analyzed the monopoly limit pricing game model and established the signaling game model in real estate transaction, and finally refined the equilibrium results of the monopoly limit pricing game based on introducing signaling game theory.The traditional explanation of the monopoly limit pricing game model was based on that the price was regarded as a promise, which, as a matter of fact, was incredible. As for this deficiency, this article did a further research on this signaling game model based on signaling game theory, finding a more reasonable explanation: while other enterprises didn't know his production cost, the monopoly tended to tell other monopolies that his price was a low one, and that they would gain little or no profit if they came into the deal.This article discussed the subgame perfect Bayesian strategy on which the buyer and seller relied to infer, getting the separating equilibrium and pooling equilibrium of the buyer and seller in different situations, offering a reliable reference to the two parties when they were pursuing a respective maximum profit in the real estate transaction.While there were multiple equilibrium results in the analytical results of the monopoly limit pricing game model, which inconvenienced the analysis and application. Therefore, this article refined the equilibrium results by restricting the posterior beliefs on the non-equilibrium route and by taking advantage of both ways of elimination of weakly dominated strategy and intuitive criterion. |