Argumentation And Logic

"The Warring States Stratagems" shall be called art of rhetoric in the debate has always beenvalued by man.This paper discusses the "The Warring States Stratagems" argument in logic.Addition to the introduction and conclusion, the main part is divided into three chapters.Detailed analysis of the first chapter three laws of logic in the"The Warring States Stratagems"embodied in the debate.These three laws are the basic rules of logic, they are from different parties to ensure the certainty of thinking.Comply with all requirements to achieve the following two points: (1) concept must remain the same.(2) The judge must remain the same."Warring States" in the debate around some of the concept, through the clear meaning of the concept to achieve the purpose of persuasion, while others made a confusing concept, altered the idea of the error."The Warring States Stratagems" implicit in the judgments into judgments and judgments with respect.Implications and implicit judgments are judgments, general questions, exclamatory sentences and fables can be expressed in implicit judgments.Frankly judge, is the direct determination of things, with or without some kind of judgments.Determine not only the true and false points, but also appropriate and inappropriate in others.The content of the law of contradiction is:in the same thought process, two mutually opposed or contradictory judgments can not be true, at least one is false.The contents of excluded middle:in the same thought process, two conflicting judgments, there must be a true."The Warring States Stratagems" rhetoric in line with the law of contradiction, or some law of excluded middle, and some active use of the law of contradiction or the law of excluded middle, while others are in violation of the law of contradiction or the law of excluded middle.The second chapter discusses "The Warring States Stratagems" argument in the logical reasoning problems."The Warring States Stratagems" in the reasoning can be divided into "single-pole-style" reasoning, "indirect style" reasoning and "interactive" reasoning.An inference that only the correct form, that is logical, to be effective.However, the "The Warring States Stratagems" old, historical details are difficult to trace, so only the logic reasoning is to focus on research."The Warring States Stratagems" in the logical reasoning can be divided into inductive reasoning and analogical reasoning, inductive reasoning is the premise from the introduction of the general conclusions of individual reasoning.It is based on the premise that all things related to a class of objects, divided into complete and incomplete inductive reasoning inductive reasoning.Analogical reasoning is from individual to individual or from the particular to the specific reasoning.It is based on two (or two) things, some of the same or similar properties, infer some other properties they may be on the same or similar conclusions.The third chapter discusses the "The Warring States Stratagems" in Argumentation and logical proof, mainly expressed the following views:(1) logic proved by the arguments, arguments, and argument form, the article on the "The Warring States Stratagems" argument in these three factors made a more detailedinterpretation.(2) "The Warring States Stratagems" in the argument is logical proof.