| For more than 100 years, question concerning" China is gone toward where to go", always question in the centre of that time generation. All carried on a thorough study to the expert scholars of study different realm of this question, on the whole can is divided into three appointments in cultural philosophy:Contemporary new Confucianism cultural philosophers are over-emphasized to more now cultural abstract worth, then think that morals master consciousness of Confucianism can outstrip time and space and outstrip different social cultural back ground to work out the person's problem, existent problem, life of problem, live meaning of problem and what mankind generated Be various to is estranged with confused many problem, give person with settle down of basis. "They thought idea to set out from the abstract, ultimate end care finally Be shrunken back to a religion, stick to the search of orthodoxy of teachings, as a result exaggerated instead of shortening the thought of Confucianism is apart from and makes the cultural worth of Confucianism become not profound amid the ideal and real and float to be suffused with in."With of reversal, westernize appointment cultural philosophers to then insist vs. the worth of cultural ancient works hold" the attitude for adjudicating", negate its history worth and negate its reality worth further, therefore, they are from the theory of "the traditional cultural maladjustment modern lives" and turn over again unilateral exaggerative traditional cultural is also those contents sc and its negative effects that embody its feudal age character, and didn't see to contain the universalities factors that outstrip its age in traditional culture.But mark think cultural philosophers to make every effort"left"in the torsion of incline to and insist that having of cultural worth have no unified view after eliminating "left" impact of solution. Their knowing each other to any cultural worth is all unity of abstract worth and concrete worth, the abstract cultural worth is placed in concrete cultural worth in. Only the synthesis of thing history view is creative is so. "They anti from idea of the text set out to comprehend and explain the person's fulfillment, but observe cultural independence and culture to be worth of from the history power driven system how from" have no" to "have", how the Ian save of, unlimited and abstract cultural worth and concrete history culture is worth of a conversion being worth of for reality and expands for the original Dian, textual interpretation with release righteousness space." This would is to created sex convert, is also thing history view to only synthesize the nucleus of creative cultural philosophers search. Therefore, the cultural view of "synthesis innovation" is objective, it overcame the emotion that the contemporary new scholar learns cultural philosophy and westernization to send to mix up in cultural philosophy now to turn, and the Juan falsely turned irregularity. Set out from this cultural value, cultural philosophers affirm that future Chinese culture will be China and world of, tradition and modernization of, the organic wedge bonding or unity of science and humanities.These three groups all begin from 54 new culture running, at after arguing of a century Jive and game, they at outstrip amid w., thou now it contend for, break through a body to use, shape up it argued aspect to basically forming a consensus, but guided thought in Chinese prospective, cultural master etc. still existence emphasize big rift, these questions don't understand definitely, constructing socialism advanced culture will definitely become an empty talk. The dress handsome Qing once said:"Cultural philosophy will become philosophy of having the impact in 21st century Fan Shi or philosophy appearance push most the cultural philosophy search alignment of China deepen, should contrive in the aspects of constructing or purchasing a modern social Chinese predominance cultural spirit and convert cultural philosophy studying Fan Shi Liang."This article mainly divides into three chapters:The first chapter is the introduction, first narrated that question statement, the author was mainly discusses in US's political scientist Huntington's civilized conflict initiates the wish research culture impulsion, the fact had proven, China was in modernized reforming this kind of special time, how should deal with the Chinese and foreign and the ancient and modern culture is contradictory, is important question which we were unable to evade. After hundred remaining years of life's explorations, discovered finally the Chinese characteristic socialism culture development path is most suits the Chinese national condition, only then the synthesis innovation's culture philosophic thinking is China's unwise electing.The second chapter is under the modernized background, under each kind of Western society ideological trend influence, how China to deal with the modernization, again through Chinese modernization's two reforming, the learn lesson, settles on country culture modernization reforming from the external environment and the historic experience stratification plane. The last chapter is mainly the quest that discusses the road of Chinese cultural innovation and how make use of mark to think only the road of the synthesis innovation of the method of the thing history view and visual angle realize Chinese culture of cultural philosophy and comprehensive creative definition, foundation, principle, direction, comprehensive the creative method is in the fulfillment how apply.This article place of innovation lies in the attempt under the modernized background, which will analyze the Chinese future leading cultural spirit as well as Chinese culture reforming using the cultural philosophy's angle of view and the Marx historical materialism's method, should have to practice the method. Besides philosophy angle of view, this article also using history, sociology and so on different analysis angle of view. Says on the research technique, this article mainly by the contradictory analytic method and the system analytic method primarily, simultaneously profits from other social sciences and the natural sciences research technique, like comparison test, case law, real diagnosis law and so on. |