Blind Children And Normal Children's Analogical Reasoning Is A Comparative Study

Analogy reasoning is an essential constitution of reasoning. It is a hotfield of thought study. The study uses lexical method to examme the similarityand difference between congenital blind children and normal children in analo-asoning. The results of the study lead to the following conclusions:gy reasoning. The results of the study lead to the folowing conclusions:1. The blind children and normal children in Grade 2 - 4 have no signifi-cant difference in their analogy reasoning score and that of analogy relationshipexpression.2. Neither gender nor parent education has significant impact on the anal-asoning score reasoning score and that of analogy relationship expression of the normalchildre in Grade 2 - 4.3. Neither gender nor parent education has significant impact on the anal-ogy reasoning score and that of analogy relationship expression of the normalchildren in Grade 2 - 5.4.The blind children in Grade 2 and normal children in Grade 4 are onthe same chronological age level, and they show significant difference in anal-ogy reasoning score, the latter have higher scores.5.The development of the blind children's andlogy reasoning ability isnot balanced, they develop better in causality analogy leasoning.6. All children's abitity implnves as they grow older, but Grade 4 is aturning point where normal children greatly improve their ability to expressanalogy relationship.