Xie Mixed, Xie Lingyun, Xie Z, Xie Tiao And Eastern Jin And Southern Literature Changes

It seems that the main sequence of ideas of six dynasties' literature is as clear as follows: The Metaphysical Discourse Poetry is very popular in Dong Jin dynasty, which lasts almost one hundred years, until new aesthetic preference is promoted in the last stage of DongJin dynasty by Xie Hun and his landscape poems. The Taoist school is at low ebb and the landscape poetry is just in the ascendant in the LiuSong dynasty. Although there are some vestiges in Xie Lingyun's poem, the topic of Xie Lingyun's poem is landscape. Sheng Yue advanced the rhythm theoretic that is followed by poets, which contributed a lot to the harmonious poem. Xie Tiao's poem is natural and spontaneous. Its only pity is that the thought is acuminous but the acquirement is weak. The current thesis renewedly discusses this conclusion that seems to be true and advance a series of brand-new viewpoints, furthermore, draw the outline of the transformation of Six Dynasties' litterateur, especially, the Jing's, Song's and Qi's.Thesis is made of four sections besides the introduction.The first section is titled as Xie Hun and the change of the metaphysical discourse vogwe.When the process of transformation from Metaphysical Discourse Poetry to Landscape Poetry of Jin and Song dynasties is discussed, our predecessors often regard Xie Hun as the trendsetter, Furthermore, People of our time firmly believe that Xie Hun started this transformation by bis landscape work. We conclude: Xie Hun's fresh and fluent poetic manner helps to dilute the metaphysical discourse vogue,but his landscape work does not prominently impact in the transformation of metaphysical discourse vogue. Moreover, in the growth history of landscape poem, he does not have the merit of being a vanguard.The second section is titled as Xie Lingyun and the prosperity of MetaphysicalDiscourse Poetry. Xie Lingyun is always regarded as the originator of landscape poetry. The current thesis restudies this question on the basis of study on his living background and cultural interest. These viewpoints are supported as following: Xie Lingyun still write Metaphysical Discourse Poetry. The part of metaphysical discourse is the leitmotiv of his poem, which we generally think as a tail-like part.The third section is titled as Xie Zhuang: the forerunner of Yongmig style. It is generally deemed that the crucial change between old style poetry and new style poetry was happened in the Yongming epoch. However, the standpoint of the current thesis is that the linchpin is the innovation on antithesis and rhythm of poetry that advanced by Xie Lingyun and Xie Tiao.The current thesis explains the difference on literary quotation using and emotion expressing of Xie Tiao and Xie Lingyun, so expose the essential.The fourth section is titled as it is said that Xie Tiao's poetry is delicate and pure. Times without number, the researcher refers to the pity of Xie Tiao, weak acquirements. However, no one has explained what does this pity meaning, so that the answer to this question is still conflicting, on the basis of understanding the words, the paper begins with " weak acquirements "and " acuminous thought", and compare it with Xie Lingyun's poem to explain the difference between the two peoples, thereby, open out the essential of vicissitude of the poetry style in Song dynasty and Qi dynasty.