How To Dress Up "the Girl"?

"There is no content in thinking empty, blind to have no concept ocularly", method and angle that look at problem give tool that people know, particular method and angle limitation of itself become the obstacle of realizing the true colors of things again at the same time. How to reach the truth under such mankind's eternal predicament? Traditional philosophy use, affirm and method constructed to build go, look for and explore the essence of thing, fall into, speak absolute predicament of by speech with relativity in fact, instead more and more far from truth. Back modernism philosophy pay attention to methodology, solve, construct essence and truth to know the back through method and route (such as language symbol) known to review, and suspect spirit has emancipated the mind, it is the human understanding that has opened up a piece of space advanced instead in way that is denied.Epistemology is like this, the domain of history is the same. Traditional history believe reason to be omnipotent, attempt, rely on general reason look for"loud to narrate"history, announce essence and truth of history; Can believe a historian"frank book accurately", reconstruct all of the historical fact. And then modern history is challenged to the mode of thinking of"yuan are narrated", reviewing to the foundation of traditional history and challenge, a key breakthrough point is thinking languages opaque, have its inherent structure. People must be limited by it, if people use languages to express the thought. In after modern history there,have no regularity and essential"capitalize by history"s fixed by each no longer history, and has become"a little girl who can let persons dress up". Though, back modern history has some extremes in theory, as the trend of a kind of rebellion, its suspicion spirit has very important effect on development that history realizes.In the last few years, in our country's art history field, the methodology question becomes the front problem receiving much concern too, interpreter and publishing a large number of western research works. But art history of China whom writing lack independent discipline at the consciousness and method still conscientious at present, it shows concretely as follows: Work of a lot of history of art only pays attention to the subjective description of the experience phenomenon, regard appreciating as the writing of the history of art by mistake, has written the history of art as the reader of appreciating; Some history of art put, go, study of the broad social culture background artistic phenomenon, derive expected conclusion and law out only by the limited materials; Some history of art attempt, resume history objective, use the archaeological material in a large amount, make the history of art turn into the archaeological history of fine arts……. Carry on to the art history text introspection of methodology herein to fetch that think, this text mainly chooses three outstanding texts in the writing of history of art of China: Wang Bo Min's history, painting of China,Li Yu's key link, history of art of China,and Fang Wen's the heart prints of bath Li --Chinese Painting and Calligraphy style and structure analyse and research, pass to three history of art writing introspection of method of work, emphasize different writing methods and observe the angle outstandingly, will bring different results to the writing of art history. So as to emphasize the author's idea, importance of observation angle and methodology in the writing of art history. This text thinks as the art history of humane scientific research, every different writing starting points have formed history of different appearances, produce the inevitable blind spot with reading by mistake at the same time. People's understanding is not ultimate, the understanding of history is not ultimate either, the constant one is"building and constructing"and is"solved and constructed","guess"constant one and it is between"refute",intelligence and glamour where history study where mankind know could splendor of flashing constantly, in front of mankind every step that pursuit know, we should go on rational analysis and study to them.This text divides four parts together:Chapter one: Art history narrated. Regard Wang Bo Min's history of art as the text, analyze two outstanding characteristics of the art history narrated: Historical philosophy and truth view to accord with theory of real example, respect fact, pay attention to, criticize of a text, attempt, reach objective history know historical research approach. The art history of narration of Wang BoMin carries on the introspection on methodology through an analysis of their limitation, separately from understanding subject that history know, know object and art history recreation and sports analyze further " for objective art history? "This question.Chapter two: Art history criticized. Until history of art of Li Yu as text, two outstanding characteristics of art history that analyse and criticize: Replace the research of art history and mechanical theory of reflection with the formula " the = realism of the history of art is with non- realistic contradiction struggle ", As to the thing that logic come, hold art history study the problem, compare to black historical philosophy with art history of bath Li of dose mainly, prove art history of bath Li historical simplification of philosophy use to wicked dose. Artistic theory of reflection the issue right art history that criticize analyze and criticize to the simple application of theory on one hand correctly in addition, on the other hand give affirmation and further exploration to the desirable place of this theory and theory space that can be explored.Chapter three: Art history of style analysis. Regard Fang Wen's history of art as the text,analyze and then style that smell analyze the logic course forming, this text thinks the style of the past Chinese history of art is analysed and researched and often influenced by essential doctrine of the art history the difference ignored between culture and culture, thus among the trap to fall into teleology, and art history that side hear study, pass, solve true and false problem, Chinese and Western problem and teleology problem, have studied and opened up the new route for the history of art of China. However, and then the style research of hearing has its limitation too, any will all have the possibility to construct solved to build theory constructed, the limitation of research approach which the other side heard in terms of symbol theory of this part has been analyzed, attempt, prove and then though the research approach that smell make meaningful contribution on history of art of China, but any method does not have absolute meaning, just study an angle and opinion of the problem.Chapter four: Preceding three chapter make internal analysis and introspection to three history of art writing way separately, chapter four draws to art history view, art criticism, different views of the same research object by stages and in different art history text of art history, sum up and happen to the assurance of three kinds of basic modes and comparative analysis in the writing of history of art of China.This text tries hard to start with concrete analysis and horizontal comparison to three kinds of basic modes of writing of history of art of China, announce the important meaning in the writing of art history of methodology, this research has certain value to the development of the contemporary artistic historiography family.