As Ontological Proposition "i Think Therefore I Am"

Meditationes is the "existence(being)" by " Cogito , ergo sum sive cxiso." elucidation of this proposition. " Cogito,ergosum" self-made, the academics on the subject of common concern. Descartes as the first principle of metaphysics, which reaffirmed the dual physical and psychological, the existence of God, immortal soul, such as the traditional theological proposition, in the idea in no doubt that the establishment of a foundation, not only to dispel the doubt, but also the development of science cleared the obstacle, and that philosophy, theology proper, science can leave this beautiful.However, the idea was from then theology, philosophy, science and a wide range of criticism. Gift ideas from suspected Ways to first principles, God argues that the contemplation of its refutation to infiltrate every aspect of their philosophy, set up as if he is not convinced of its truth is a mistake, however. If so, there would be no further need to discuss, but in fact has been recognized as Cartesian philosophy and meditation can not be bypassed in the element, but also future generations of philosophy was the most mentioned, in particular, " Cogito,ergosum . " The first proposition made to the detailed, systematic discussion of Kant are, he will, " Cogito,ergosum ." as "per Sophisma figurae dictionis" is a fallacy of reasoning, Kant is interpreted in the negative sense Meditation Descartes, but Descartes is still accepted by the opening of the Subjekt (self), but in Kant where "self" is a priori the main charm of the concept of a more scientific replaced over a period of time, the academic for the " Cogito,ergosum " views are in fact primarily by the impact of Kant.In recent years, with the existential situation of the study and prosperity, Husserl's "transcendental ego" deep contact with the Cartesian more people know, try to set up the foundation of science, as Descartes by the demands of loyalty, in this one common purpose, the study situation came into being, in order to provide a new philosophy and to explore ways and opportunities; At the same time, Heidegger would take a more macro perspective, grasp the metaphysics of the subject - there is, all aspects interpretation of the Cartesian meditation. Descartes both thought of as providing the views of the dominant. In addition, there is also the perspective of scholars in other studies such as Philosophy of Mind (The philosophy of mind), to the United States ? Colin McGinn (Colin McGinn), Serge (John R. Searle) as the representative of the main issues Philosophy of Mind psychosomatic problem is that the psychological situation of the nature of the relationship between mind and body problem, the United States in recent years in the development of more rapid, more significant results; structuralism, the thought of Descartes for the focus on "self" concept of uncertainty analysis, such as Foucault, Derrida. With the modern philosophy of Europe and the United States Learn more depth and domestic scholars in the study of Cartesian thought also proceed from a modern perspective, the perspective of multiple, many of which naturally show the proposition for the traditional philosophy and method of study on the idea of more sophisticated, but also exposed a number of shortcomings: Overall, for the Descartes Meditation still weak grasp of the macro, in the face of a lot of problems has been the philosophy of Descartes, on still at the discussion of the details it is not enough strength in the this point, Heidegger's analysis of the Cartesian meditation should be considered to be concerned about the macro, but the current situation on the domestic research seems to focus more on Heidegger is for some the concept of Cartesian thought (the world, Cogito, time) the discussion, however, has always been to explore the metaphysics of Martin Heidegger, the traditional philosophy for all aspects of the changes are not only questions are, together with the methods and attitudes of one anti-"common sense" is precisely, therefore, for the Cartesian Meditation is also a discussion if we do not regard the whole, it is difficult to reflect this change, or it can be said that too much accountability on the lowering of the details of its style. Know in this, the text is intended as the center in the demands of metaphysics under the guidance of the problem of Cartesian thought, with the key concepts and aspects of philosophy and attitude of the discussion, in order to achieve the traditional philosophy for this proposition depth grasp.Generally speaking:First of all, " Cogito,ergosum " put forward to discuss the metaphysics of Descartes will be reduced to a problem - "What is there?" In the traditional philosophy, based on how he answers this question - "I think . " Thinking, as well as the open in its new philosophy of the progress made in focusing on Kant's philosophy and attitude of the Cartesian inheritance and development.On this basis, to the existence of Heidegger's look at the Cartesian vision of the "presence" Thinking, in accordance with the "Being and Time" on the structure of the Cartesian analysis of the proposition compared to the existence of Cartesian thinking of On the existence of a problem in the face should be shown with the scale.Finally, in "Introduction to Metaphysics" under the guidance of Heidegger's discussion of "presence" to continue to ask, that is, "to ask their own."According to this structure, the concern is not just on the Cartesian "I think therefore I am" This is the proposition, but rather of metaphysics itself. In other words, is the existence of Cartesian metaphysics of vision into under, and in its scale (in this case is in Heidegger's "Being and Time," shows us a picture of the existence of the problem, methods, field of vision) to assessment, this assessment only in the presence of Heidegger's thinking on the make-depth study may be the case, this is difficult, therefore, of Heidegger's discussion will be a very length, which is the proportion of the arrangement of this paper, but how to be discussed under the general direction of metaphysical meditation Descartes, I am still confused, they also had to accommodate this.