Practical Analysis Of Ebony Ownership

In recent years, several cases of dispute over the ownership ebony occurred, causing practical and academic attention, highly controversial. Pengzhou "astronomical ebony case" is of concern, aroused great interest in the media and academia. For Ebony nature and attribution is controversial. As more and ebony similar property was found for national legislation in this area should improve as soon as possible. Scholars have different opinions regarding the attribution of ebony. There are the following: owned by the state, all owned by the landowner for preemptive preemptive system owned by people to obtain, difficult to identify other statements. For the attribution of ebony, ultimately depends on the nature of what is ebony. For what is the nature of ebony, the more important a few points are: natural fruits that mineral, and a treasure trove say nullius said. The author believes that ebony belong nullius principle should apply preemption. No matter whether the host country and the concept of preemptive regime. This must be accounted for in the first argument I had a civil law system, the legitimacy of the system. I made two assumptions. Whether it is a simple proof of the ebony owned by the state or owned by people of all preemptive are significant vulnerabilities. I had to be combined with the characteristics of their own economic system, based on the theory of labor remuneration were treated different values nullius. Finally, in order to prevent the recurrence of such disputes should be clearly defined and nullius treasure trove of these two concepts, improve the relevant system. I too should insist on the basis of public ownership, to ensure maximum ownership of the people. On our civil legislation clearly stipulates extremely Elements preemptive system, owned by the state of the high value of unowned natural objects or artifacts regulations.