An Empirical Study On The Relative Concentration Of Administrative Cases

Many courts begins to practice the relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case after they explore the system of High-level jurisdiction and jurisdiction of different place in order to solve the urgent problems of local administrative intervention on administrative trial. The relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation is a system where administrative litigation cases usually tried by different courts are brought together to assigned courts. The courts of relative centralized jurisdiction have the convenient transportation and the experienced judge of administrative trial. The reform of jurisdiction has achieved some results and provided experience for separate the administrative area and the jurisdiction since the reform practiced in some intermediate courts. However, the problems of continuous existence of administrative intervention by local administrative organ, the imbalance of administrative trial team in primary courts and the incomplete of incentive system on administrative trial are emerging gradually, which were criticized by some scholar. Therefore, it is very important to summary and analyze the problems of the relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation. At the same time, we should make suggestions about the problems.The article focuses on collating and analyzing the data on the effect of the pilot work of the relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case in Guang’an on the basis of generalizing the main content of the relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case in intermediate court of Guang’an. And the data includes the different attitudes and evaluation on the system of relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case by different parts, the effect of relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case in intermediate court of Guang’an. According to the data, the article evaluates the practice of relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case in intermediate court of Guang’an, including the success that is achieved and the sustained problems in the practice of jurisdiction reform. At last, the article summarizes the effective measures about the centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation,including practicing the system of centralized management in local courts, which is the centre, and carrying out the measures for administrative litigants effectively, and reforming the criteria of assessment on administrative trial, and improving the coordination system inside the courts, and implementing the professional guarantee of administrative judge. Simultaneously, the article discusses the direction of the jurisdictional system reform. That is to say, the relative centralized jurisdiction of administrative case will practice generally in courts, and the system of administrative ligation across administrative regional jurisdiction will put into practice gradually.