| 1. The dissert, Marx on labor force of two basic conditions becomes commodity, is very incisive and penetrating, it's the abstract science theory of the history given rise to society economy appearance. No doubt, as long as having the two basic conditions in the same time Marx put forward, labor force just certainly becomes the commodity. However the questions depend on: if having the two basic conditions in different time, if laborers not only have personal liberty but also the means of production, do laborers still sell labor force? Can labor force still become the commodity? For this question, it needs to carry on the concrete analysis according to the method of means of production and how much they hold, as well as how much the benefit laborers realized from combining both.In the contemporary western developed capitalist countries, quite many laborers who have personal liberty and really own a thing still sell labor force. This is chiefly because their own means of production are too few, and relying on merely his proprietary rights income still not to be enough to keep his basic life, and the means still can only be selling labor force thus general worker chiefly seeks a livelihood.Laborers not only have the personal liberty, but also means of production under our socialist country market economy condition. If labor becomes commodity, it needs concrete analysis on the basis of the combination method of means of production and the practical realization form of laborer's economy interest, as well as who employ them etc, concrete analysis must be carried on according to certain circumstances.2. Correctly to know and genuinely establish the important position of capital category in economy of socialism market, firstly we need to know and really establish the important position of the surplus value category in economy of socialism market. Secondly, we need, from its concept and general knowledge, to make further clear about the general character, individuality and his mutual relations under the two kinds of social systems, capitalism and socialism, and the mutual relations and essential difference between the capitals.The surplus value, all possesses the general nature no matter from qualitative regularity and from the regularity of capacity. This kind of surplus value not only exists in capitalism private ownership economy, but also exists in socialism public ownership economy. The difference of surplus value only depends on in two kinds of social systems, socialism and capitalism: production premise is different; owners and usage are different; also embodies different social economy relation. Surplus value thought merely used for the analysis of capitalism economy, and can not be used for the category of the analysis socialism economy, or would cause the confusion with two kinds of economic systems, socialism and capitalism, as a matter of fact, is absolutely no basis.The same as the surplus value, capital as one kind of value to be existed, as a value tobring surplus value, it's the form of capital value that can bring the surplus value, also is an unification of special, general character and individuality. The general character of capital relies on reproduction and motion. The individuality of capital relies on the particularities of the social form of capital and motion form.The capital of socialism and capitalism, the two kinds of social systems, not only has the common character but also has the difference. The common character relies on reproduction and motion. The difference can get from the respective comparison with the capital in capitalism society from public-owned and nonpublic-owned capital in socialism society. From the comparison between public-owned of socialism and privately-owned capital of capitalism, the resource of capital is different; the position and function are different; the capital reproduction premise is also different; the owning and usage of capital reproduction are different; the law of capital motion and capital accumulation is different too.From comparison... |
PDF Full Text Request