Time Limit Of Evidence In Civil Proceedings

The institution of time limit of adducing evidence is an importantarea of our civil procedural system, After the birth of the "SupremePeople's Court on a number of provisions of civil evidence"(rules ofevidence) .The institution of time limit of adducing evidence receivedattention, especially for the introduction of the Evidence Act establishedat first, the author discussed the institution of time limit of adducingevidence from different angles in this country.The Introduction part of the author to write this raises the mind andintentions in finding a balance between evidence at any time and timelyproof-system——the establishment of the institution of time limit ofadducing evidenceThe second part of the definition and elements of the institution oftime limit of adducing evidence briefly, by the nature and categories ofthe institution of time limit of adducing evidence, thus making way belowtheir introduction.The third part of a comparison, analysis of the study by the institutionof time limit of adducing evidence of common law and civil law pre-trialproceedings system studies, raises the institution of time limit ofadducing evidence of our country, the procedures through their nationalreforms on the system of any one generation has its roots and growthenvironment, and introduced the common law and civil law systems havemore sameness and difference after both, My reference to the institutionof time limit of adducing evidence and to learn from.The fourth part of the institution of time limit of adducing evidencetheory expounded the value and significance, especially for the evidenceat any time, for mainstream in our country, on the evidence at any timepresented, and timely evidence analyzing two models, presented proof ofdue process-system value, the economic value of the proceedings, honestvalue and the credit for my trial reform.The fifth part, the institution of time limit of adducing evidencesystem in the development of the soil, and the difficult process ofdevelopment in our country The institution of time limit of adducingevidence system has its positive significance Namely, the "rules ofevidence" for the introduction of our reforms to the judicial proceedingsof a needle "low", particularly for the first time spelled out the evidenceand proof-exchange system, the parties should be provided in thestandard time frame of proof, and clearly defined in "the proof is notsubmitted within the time-frame, as to the rights of proof" evidence of theright to legal consequences too, My evidence resolved "attacks",increased efficiency of the proceedings. However, any new system has itsimperfections of the total establishment, but also explain the negativeimpact of the institution of time limit of adducing evidenceThis is the sixth part of the focus of this paper stated, refer to myresponse to the " the institution of time limit of adducing evidence" had aperfect set from the "rules of evidence" to prove itself time system, andthe corresponding the institution of time limit of adducing evidenceinfrastructure improved, the establishment of our genuine, developmentsuited to China's national conditions--the institution of time limit ofadducing evidence.