Criticism On National Economics In Paris Manuscript

"Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844"(hereinafter referred to as "Paris manuscripts") so is seen as the secret of Marxist philosophy and birthplace, because is here, in the foundation of Marx launched an ontology of philosophy revolution. And the philosophical revolution so can occur, and Marx in the writings of national economics or political economics criticism is closely associated with it. A certain sense, to say no to the critique of political economy, there will be no revolution of Marxist philosophy. Critique of political economy, is the premise of Marx philosophy revolution and also is the important content of Marx’s philosophy and expression form.In "Paris manuscripts" critical analysis of the national economics, is the necessity of internal logic of Marx thought development. In the Rhine newspaper period in order to solve the trouble problems( " comment on material benefits " difficult), Marx criticism of Hegel’s philosophy of law and the national philosophy to study. Through this research, Marx found that, for the country, the method of these concepts to really understand, need to dissect the civil society. And anatomy of civil society, it has to be criticism of political economics research. Just at that time, able to criticize the national economics research, Marx had: one is in exile in Paris, the economics of Marx to read a lot of work and materials. Secondly, Feuerbach "humanitarian and empirical naturalistic criticism" laid the foundation for this study."Paris manuscripts", Marx’s critique of the national economics mainly around the two basic contents: one is the basic category of the national economics, such as "salary", "capital" and "rent" is a critical analysis. The second is the development of national economics theory stage is a critical review. Through the critical analysis of the national economics, Marx believes that the national economic theory into antinomy everywhere, its basic reason lies in the fact that it as the theoretical premise of the category "labor" is not "natural labor", but "alienation labor". National economists mistake, although it is starting from the fact that private property, but not to the origin of private property. It put the things they need to inference as the premise of the established. But it also means that science of national economics as the civil society, it is the eternal existence of the capitalism as a defence.Through the analysis on the relationship between the labor alienation and private property, Marx is alienation labor has a private property, and then with each other and cause and effect between them. According to Marx’s understanding, since the private property is the externalization of man’s life sensibility or alienation, since a human history to today is the movement of private property that is the history of the production and consumption, so, history also is actually own perceptual life continue to reality or history- though is presented in the form of alienation. But, after all, is a kind of alienation to the person’s unbearable alien force. People to realize and full possession of his own nature, society to truly become the humanity of the society, must have the communist practice movement, must have a positive sublation of alienation labor.Marx in "Paris manuscripts" criticism of the national economics, the critical theory achievement is directly lead to alienation of labor theory and the theory of communism is put forward, the theoretical achievements of indirect is provides the original historical materialism of Marx’s later system thinking method. The idea is "to thing itself", rather than starting from the subjective imagination or abstract concept understanding and grasp of the world. In "German ideology", Marx called it the description of the "experience".